Actions on the case for various kinds of economic loss

J. Baker
{"title":"Actions on the case for various kinds of economic loss","authors":"J. Baker","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198847809.003.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter is concerned with miscellaneous actions on the case for causing economic loss, particularly in the context of monopolies. An action for drawing customers away from a market was allowed in 1310, and other monopolies were recognized under manorial customs, but a monopoly could not be acquired simply by being the first to use a trade in a particular place. A novel action of 1584 for infringing a trademark included elements of deceit and defamation, but there was as yet no concept of intellectual property. Monopolies granted by patent received a blow from a leading decision of 1602 concerning playing-cards. New kinds of economic tort were recognized in actions for intimidation (1621) and malicious injury in trade (1707), raising possibilities to be exploited in much later periods.","PeriodicalId":197105,"journal":{"name":"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198847809.003.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with miscellaneous actions on the case for causing economic loss, particularly in the context of monopolies. An action for drawing customers away from a market was allowed in 1310, and other monopolies were recognized under manorial customs, but a monopoly could not be acquired simply by being the first to use a trade in a particular place. A novel action of 1584 for infringing a trademark included elements of deceit and defamation, but there was as yet no concept of intellectual property. Monopolies granted by patent received a blow from a leading decision of 1602 concerning playing-cards. New kinds of economic tort were recognized in actions for intimidation (1621) and malicious injury in trade (1707), raising possibilities to be exploited in much later periods.
就案件的各种经济损失采取行动
本章涉及造成经济损失案件的各种诉讼,特别是在垄断的情况下。1310年,从市场上吸引顾客的行为被允许,庄园惯例也承认了其他垄断行为,但垄断不能仅仅通过在特定地方第一个使用一种贸易来获得。1584年,一项针对侵犯商标的新诉讼包含了欺骗和诽谤的要素,但当时还没有知识产权的概念。专利授予的垄断受到了1602年一项关于扑克牌的重要裁决的打击。新的经济侵权行为在恐吓(1621年)和贸易中的恶意伤害(1707年)中得到了承认,这增加了在更晚的时期被利用的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信