Introduction to Civility and Participatory Democracy

Thomas P. Boje
{"title":"Introduction to Civility and Participatory Democracy","authors":"Thomas P. Boje","doi":"10.4337/9781789907773.00005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why is there so much focus now on civil society and citizenship in relation to participation and inclusion in late-modern society? Firstly, the civil society organizations have been – and still are – crucial in guaranteeing the economic, social and political rights of the individual. Only by constantly making demands for social justice and fighting for the rights to which citizens are entitled, is it possible for people to ensure and safeguard their own and others’ security. Secondly, citizenship and the rights and duties associated with it are fundamental to social cohesion and democratic participation. Nation-states differentiate between citizens with all, limited or no rights in relation to citizenship. It is in this context that the many and diverse organizations in the civil sphere can play a central role. They have the potential to help ensure that the democratic decision-making process involves all social groups, including vulnerable ones, in both the development and the implementation of decisions on welfare policies. Neither market nor state institutions, as these two spheres are currently constituted, can do this; but it should be possible to develop democratic and inclusive organizations at the interfaces between civil society and other spheres of society. The core of the interrelationship between state and civil society is, then, the degree of democratic control and collective engagement within individual organizations, whether public or private. In this respect, it is plausible to talk about state institutions operating on civil society’s terms provided that citizens are in charge of the decision-making, and the structures are democratic, built from the bottom up, and involve the target groups for the institutions’ work. To introduce this type of democratic participation, it is crucial that new institutional forms of involvement and decision-making processes are developed by civil society organizations as well as public and private institutions. Initiatives designed to facilitate this development, firstly, must have the potential to counteract the social and cultural differentiation that invariably arises between social groups in civil society. Secondly, these initiatives must ensure a more equitable distribution of economic and social resources than is the case in the current representative system. Thirdly, they must make it possible to stem the marginalization triggered by processes of segregation in the labour","PeriodicalId":282347,"journal":{"name":"Civility and Participatory Democracy","volume":"519 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civility and Participatory Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789907773.00005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Why is there so much focus now on civil society and citizenship in relation to participation and inclusion in late-modern society? Firstly, the civil society organizations have been – and still are – crucial in guaranteeing the economic, social and political rights of the individual. Only by constantly making demands for social justice and fighting for the rights to which citizens are entitled, is it possible for people to ensure and safeguard their own and others’ security. Secondly, citizenship and the rights and duties associated with it are fundamental to social cohesion and democratic participation. Nation-states differentiate between citizens with all, limited or no rights in relation to citizenship. It is in this context that the many and diverse organizations in the civil sphere can play a central role. They have the potential to help ensure that the democratic decision-making process involves all social groups, including vulnerable ones, in both the development and the implementation of decisions on welfare policies. Neither market nor state institutions, as these two spheres are currently constituted, can do this; but it should be possible to develop democratic and inclusive organizations at the interfaces between civil society and other spheres of society. The core of the interrelationship between state and civil society is, then, the degree of democratic control and collective engagement within individual organizations, whether public or private. In this respect, it is plausible to talk about state institutions operating on civil society’s terms provided that citizens are in charge of the decision-making, and the structures are democratic, built from the bottom up, and involve the target groups for the institutions’ work. To introduce this type of democratic participation, it is crucial that new institutional forms of involvement and decision-making processes are developed by civil society organizations as well as public and private institutions. Initiatives designed to facilitate this development, firstly, must have the potential to counteract the social and cultural differentiation that invariably arises between social groups in civil society. Secondly, these initiatives must ensure a more equitable distribution of economic and social resources than is the case in the current representative system. Thirdly, they must make it possible to stem the marginalization triggered by processes of segregation in the labour
《文明与参与式民主导论
为什么现在人们如此关注公民社会和公民身份与参与和包容在现代社会中的关系?第一,民间社会组织在保障个人的经济、社会和政治权利方面一直是而且仍然是至关重要的。只有不断地要求社会正义,争取公民应有的权利,人们才有可能确保和维护自己和他人的安全。第二,公民身份及其相关的权利和义务是社会凝聚力和民主参与的基础。民族国家将公民区分为享有所有、有限或没有公民权利的公民。正是在这种情况下,民间领域的许多不同组织才能发挥中心作用。它们有可能帮助确保民主决策过程使所有社会群体,包括脆弱群体,参与福利政策决定的制定和执行。市场机构和国家机构——这两个领域目前的构成——都无法做到这一点;但是,应该有可能在民间社会和社会其他领域之间建立民主和包容的组织。因此,国家与公民社会相互关系的核心是,无论是公共组织还是私人组织内部的民主控制和集体参与程度。在这方面,谈论国家机构在公民社会的条件下运作是合理的,前提是公民负责决策,结构是民主的,自下而上地建立,并让机构工作的目标群体参与进来。为了实行这种民主参与,至关重要的是,民间社会组织以及公共和私人机构必须发展新的机构形式的参与和决策过程。首先,旨在促进这一发展的倡议必须有潜力抵消民间社会各社会群体之间不可避免地产生的社会和文化差异。第二,这些主动行动必须确保比目前的代议制更公平地分配经济和社会资源。第三,它们必须能够制止由劳工隔离过程所引起的边缘化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信