Leveraging Denoised Abstract Meaning Representation for Grammatical Error Correction

He Cao, Dongyan Zhao
{"title":"Leveraging Denoised Abstract Meaning Representation for Grammatical Error Correction","authors":"He Cao, Dongyan Zhao","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2307.02127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) is the task of correcting errorful sentences into grammatically correct, semantically consistent, and coherent sentences. Popular GEC models either use large-scale synthetic corpora or use a large number of human-designed rules. The former is costly to train, while the latter requires quite a lot of human expertise. In recent years, AMR, a semantic representation framework, has been widely used by many natural language tasks due to its completeness and flexibility. A non-negligible concern is that AMRs of grammatically incorrect sentences may not be exactly reliable. In this paper, we propose the AMR-GEC, a seq-to-seq model that incorporates denoised AMR as additional knowledge. Specifically, We design a semantic aggregated GEC model and explore denoising methods to get AMRs more reliable. Experiments on the BEA-2019 shared task and the CoNLL-2014 shared task have shown that AMR-GEC performs comparably to a set of strong baselines with a large number of synthetic data. Compared with the T5 model with synthetic data, AMR-GEC can reduce the training time by 32\\% while inference time is comparable. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to incorporate AMR for grammatical error correction.","PeriodicalId":352845,"journal":{"name":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.02127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) is the task of correcting errorful sentences into grammatically correct, semantically consistent, and coherent sentences. Popular GEC models either use large-scale synthetic corpora or use a large number of human-designed rules. The former is costly to train, while the latter requires quite a lot of human expertise. In recent years, AMR, a semantic representation framework, has been widely used by many natural language tasks due to its completeness and flexibility. A non-negligible concern is that AMRs of grammatically incorrect sentences may not be exactly reliable. In this paper, we propose the AMR-GEC, a seq-to-seq model that incorporates denoised AMR as additional knowledge. Specifically, We design a semantic aggregated GEC model and explore denoising methods to get AMRs more reliable. Experiments on the BEA-2019 shared task and the CoNLL-2014 shared task have shown that AMR-GEC performs comparably to a set of strong baselines with a large number of synthetic data. Compared with the T5 model with synthetic data, AMR-GEC can reduce the training time by 32\% while inference time is comparable. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to incorporate AMR for grammatical error correction.
利用去噪抽象意义表示进行语法纠错
语法纠错(GEC)是将错误的句子纠正成语法正确、语义一致和连贯的句子。流行的GEC模型要么使用大规模的合成语料库,要么使用大量人为设计的规则。前者的训练成本很高,而后者则需要相当多的人类专业知识。近年来,语义表示框架AMR以其完备性和灵活性被广泛应用于许多自然语言任务中。一个不容忽视的问题是,语法错误句子的amr可能并不完全可靠。在本文中,我们提出了AMR- gec,这是一种将去噪的AMR作为附加知识的序列到序列模型。具体而言,我们设计了一个语义聚合的GEC模型,并探索了去噪方法,以提高amr的可靠性。在BEA-2019共享任务和CoNLL-2014共享任务上的实验表明,AMR-GEC的性能与一组具有大量合成数据的强基线相当。与使用合成数据的T5模型相比,AMR-GEC模型的训练时间缩短了32%,而推理时间相当。据我们所知,我们是第一个将AMR用于语法错误纠正的公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信