Processing Nature, Beyond the Antinomy Of Ecological Pretence In Contemporary Planning. A Critical Understanding Urban Ecosystems, The Epitome Of Liveable Cities

Vittoria Mencarini, Lorenzo Tinti
{"title":"Processing Nature, Beyond the Antinomy Of Ecological Pretence In Contemporary Planning. A Critical Understanding Urban Ecosystems, The Epitome Of Liveable Cities","authors":"Vittoria Mencarini, Lorenzo Tinti","doi":"10.37199/f40002411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the still dominant perception of a hierarchical order of nature, humans are disturbing ecosystems factors. We should move away from the one-dimensional dichotomy between natural and human interaction towards a more effective representation without nostalgia. The contact between human and natural habitats is close to the idea of maintaining and conserving a certain state of equilibrium, instead of letting natural habitats evolve into new ecosystems. In other words, energy management and the capacity of a system to self-organize (autopoiesis) defnes the difference between human and natural habitats. Where this capacity is not limited, a natural habitat is present. Contemporary landscapes (tourist coasts, reclaimed land, etc.) demonstrate this thesis by highlighting how human intervention is an indispensable factor in their maintenance. It is necessary to provide precise and sophisticated tools capable of synthesizing agents and forces within territorial transformations starting from a global understanding of natural processes. Ecological dynamics must be transformed into project parameters involved within design process. Here a further degree of integration is suggested above the level of simple natural ecosystems, where human is assumed as a key factor in landscape transformation and geography construction. Considering other paradigms that interfere with the same epistemological area, the contribution questions the theoretical and practical implications of rethinking the interaction between natural and artifcial ecosystems within the framework of landscape resilience. This perspective allows a territorial update by increasing the level of compatibility between the evolution of human habitat and the maintenance of natural regeneration times. This articulation, however, requires a reconsideration of landscape aesthetics beyond the beautiful and the consolatory, as well as a fundamental shift in landscape thinking from representation to action.","PeriodicalId":340805,"journal":{"name":"Health and Wellbeing in the Post-Pandemic City","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Wellbeing in the Post-Pandemic City","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37199/f40002411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the still dominant perception of a hierarchical order of nature, humans are disturbing ecosystems factors. We should move away from the one-dimensional dichotomy between natural and human interaction towards a more effective representation without nostalgia. The contact between human and natural habitats is close to the idea of maintaining and conserving a certain state of equilibrium, instead of letting natural habitats evolve into new ecosystems. In other words, energy management and the capacity of a system to self-organize (autopoiesis) defnes the difference between human and natural habitats. Where this capacity is not limited, a natural habitat is present. Contemporary landscapes (tourist coasts, reclaimed land, etc.) demonstrate this thesis by highlighting how human intervention is an indispensable factor in their maintenance. It is necessary to provide precise and sophisticated tools capable of synthesizing agents and forces within territorial transformations starting from a global understanding of natural processes. Ecological dynamics must be transformed into project parameters involved within design process. Here a further degree of integration is suggested above the level of simple natural ecosystems, where human is assumed as a key factor in landscape transformation and geography construction. Considering other paradigms that interfere with the same epistemological area, the contribution questions the theoretical and practical implications of rethinking the interaction between natural and artifcial ecosystems within the framework of landscape resilience. This perspective allows a territorial update by increasing the level of compatibility between the evolution of human habitat and the maintenance of natural regeneration times. This articulation, however, requires a reconsideration of landscape aesthetics beyond the beautiful and the consolatory, as well as a fundamental shift in landscape thinking from representation to action.
处理自然,超越当代规划中生态伪装的矛盾。对城市生态系统的批判性理解——宜居城市的缩影
在仍然占主导地位的自然等级秩序观念中,人类是干扰生态系统的因素。我们应该摆脱自然和人类互动之间的一维二分法,转向更有效的表现,而不是怀旧。人类与自然栖息地之间的联系接近于维持和保护某种平衡状态的想法,而不是让自然栖息地进化成新的生态系统。换句话说,能量管理和系统自组织(自创生)的能力定义了人类和自然栖息地之间的差异。在这种能力不受限制的地方,存在自然栖息地。当代景观(旅游海岸、填海造地等)通过强调人类干预是其维护中不可或缺的因素来证明这一论点。有必要提供精确和复杂的工具,能够从对自然过程的全球理解出发,在领土转变中综合各种因素和力量。在设计过程中,生态动力学必须转化为项目参数。这里建议在简单自然生态系统的基础上进一步整合,认为人类是景观转化和地理构建的关键因素。考虑到干扰同一认识论领域的其他范式,该贡献质疑了在景观弹性框架内重新思考自然生态系统和人工生态系统之间相互作用的理论和实践意义。这种视角通过提高人类栖息地的进化和自然再生时间的维持之间的兼容性水平,允许领土更新。然而,这种衔接需要重新考虑景观美学,超越美丽和安慰,以及景观思维从表现到行动的根本转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信