Latin Vocabulary Knowledge and the Readability of Latin Texts: A Preliminary Study

John Gruber-Miller, Bret Mulligan
{"title":"Latin Vocabulary Knowledge and the Readability of Latin Texts: A Preliminary Study","authors":"John Gruber-Miller, Bret Mulligan","doi":"10.52284/necj.49.1.article.gruber-millerandmulligan","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies have found a strong correlation between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading comprehension. This preliminary study of the readability of Latin texts considers how common measures of lexical complexity (word length, word frequency, lexical sophistication, lexical density, and lexical variation) can inform instructors about what texts have the least (and most) lexical complexity. By defining several key measurements of Latin lexical complexity, we establish a provisional account of the lexical difficulty of some familiar Latin texts that are frequently taught in elementary, intermediate, and advanced levels, and propose LexR, a single, informative, integrated score that provides a sense of the comparative lexical complexity of Latin texts.","PeriodicalId":298955,"journal":{"name":"New England Classical Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Classical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52284/necj.49.1.article.gruber-millerandmulligan","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Studies have found a strong correlation between vocabulary knowledge and L2 reading comprehension. This preliminary study of the readability of Latin texts considers how common measures of lexical complexity (word length, word frequency, lexical sophistication, lexical density, and lexical variation) can inform instructors about what texts have the least (and most) lexical complexity. By defining several key measurements of Latin lexical complexity, we establish a provisional account of the lexical difficulty of some familiar Latin texts that are frequently taught in elementary, intermediate, and advanced levels, and propose LexR, a single, informative, integrated score that provides a sense of the comparative lexical complexity of Latin texts.
拉丁语词汇知识与拉丁语文本可读性初探
研究发现,词汇知识与二语阅读理解之间存在很强的相关性。这项关于拉丁语文本可读性的初步研究考虑了词汇复杂性的常见测量方法(单词长度、词频、词汇复杂程度、词汇密度和词汇变化)如何能够告诉教师哪些文本的词汇复杂性最低(和最高)。通过定义拉丁语词汇复杂性的几个关键测量,我们建立了一些在初级、中级和高级课程中经常教授的熟悉的拉丁语文本的词汇难度的临时说明,并提出了LexR,一个单一的、信息丰富的、综合的分数,它提供了拉丁语文本的比较词汇复杂性的感觉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信