Corporate Stakeholders, Corporate Valuation, and ESG

Bradford Cornell, A. Shapiro
{"title":"Corporate Stakeholders, Corporate Valuation, and ESG","authors":"Bradford Cornell, A. Shapiro","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3715899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In an article published in 1987, we explained how corporate stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers, and distributors, influence financial policy and corporate behavior and why corporations have an incentive to treat these non-investor stakeholders fairly. At the heart of this explanation is the recognition that there are two fundamentally different classes of claims on a corporation. The first and most familiar are explicit contractual claims. These include employment contracts, bond indentures, product warranties, and the like. The second are implicit claims. Examples include fair treatment of employees, promise of continuing service to customers, and honest dealing with suppliers and distributors. Corporate stakeholders, all of whom have business relationships with the companies whose implicit claims they hold, value these implicit claims and are therefore prepared to pay for them. Corporate value is created by selling these implicit claims for more than it costs to honor them. More recently, a new class of non-investor stakeholders has arisen, related to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues, but with no business relationships with the companies they are making demands on. Although many ESG advocates stress their role in creating shareholder value, they provide no explanation for how this value creation occurs. In this paper, we show that implicit claims provide a critical link that ties non-investor stakeholders and ESG to shareholder value. We show why many of the demands placed on corporations by ESG advocates, in the name of corporate social responsibility, interfere with the sale of implicit claims to corporate stakeholders and may thereby destroy shareholder value.","PeriodicalId":127551,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance: Valuation","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance: Valuation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3715899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In an article published in 1987, we explained how corporate stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers, and distributors, influence financial policy and corporate behavior and why corporations have an incentive to treat these non-investor stakeholders fairly. At the heart of this explanation is the recognition that there are two fundamentally different classes of claims on a corporation. The first and most familiar are explicit contractual claims. These include employment contracts, bond indentures, product warranties, and the like. The second are implicit claims. Examples include fair treatment of employees, promise of continuing service to customers, and honest dealing with suppliers and distributors. Corporate stakeholders, all of whom have business relationships with the companies whose implicit claims they hold, value these implicit claims and are therefore prepared to pay for them. Corporate value is created by selling these implicit claims for more than it costs to honor them. More recently, a new class of non-investor stakeholders has arisen, related to Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues, but with no business relationships with the companies they are making demands on. Although many ESG advocates stress their role in creating shareholder value, they provide no explanation for how this value creation occurs. In this paper, we show that implicit claims provide a critical link that ties non-investor stakeholders and ESG to shareholder value. We show why many of the demands placed on corporations by ESG advocates, in the name of corporate social responsibility, interfere with the sale of implicit claims to corporate stakeholders and may thereby destroy shareholder value.
企业利益相关者、企业估值与ESG
在1987年发表的一篇文章中,我们解释了包括客户、员工、供应商和分销商在内的公司利益相关者如何影响财务政策和公司行为,以及为什么公司有动机公平对待这些非投资者利益相关者。这种解释的核心是承认对公司的债权有两种根本不同的类别。第一种也是最常见的是明确的合同要求。这些包括雇佣合同、债券契约、产品保证等。第二种是隐性要求。例如,公平对待员工,承诺继续为客户服务,诚实对待供应商和分销商。公司的利益相关者都与他们持有隐性债权的公司有业务关系,他们重视这些隐性债权,因此准备为它们买单。企业价值是通过出售这些隐性权利,以高于兑现这些权利的成本来创造的。最近,出现了一类新的非投资者利益相关者,他们与环境、社会和治理(ESG)问题有关,但与他们提出要求的公司没有业务关系。尽管许多ESG倡导者强调他们在创造股东价值方面的作用,但他们没有解释这种价值创造是如何发生的。在本文中,我们表明隐性索赔提供了非投资者利益相关者和ESG与股东价值之间的关键联系。我们展示了为什么ESG倡导者以企业社会责任的名义对企业提出的许多要求,干扰了向企业利益相关者出售隐性权利,从而可能破坏股东价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信