“We don’t need ergonomics anymore, we need psychology!” – the human analysis needed for human-robot collaboration

S. Fletcher, Iveta Eimontaite, P. Webb, N. Lohse
{"title":"“We don’t need ergonomics anymore, we need psychology!” – the human analysis needed for human-robot collaboration","authors":"S. Fletcher, Iveta Eimontaite, P. Webb, N. Lohse","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Human labour has always been essential in manufacturing and, still, no machine or robot can replace innate human complex physical (dexterity) and cognitive (reasoning) skills. Understandably, industry has constantly sought new automation technologies and largely only concerned itself with physical health and safety issues to improve / maintain production processes, but these industrial engineering approaches have largely overshadowed our understanding of wider social and emotional issues that can also significantly impact on human-system performance and wellbeing. In the current climate, industrial automation is rapidly increasing and crucial to manufacturing competitiveness, and requires greater, closer human interaction. Consequently, people’s cognitive-affective abilities have never been more critical and there has never been a more important time to thoroughly understand them. Moreover, industrial engineers are themselves now more aware and interested in understanding how people can better perform tasks in collaboration with intelligent automation and robotics. This paper describes why industry is only now realising the need for psychology, how far research has advanced our knowledge, and how a major UK project is working to develop new human behaviour models to improve effectiveness in the design of human-robot interactions in modern production processes. As one recent anecdotal comment from a UK industrialist set out: “we don’t need ergonomics anymore – our industrial engineers can do that, we need psychology”!","PeriodicalId":363648,"journal":{"name":"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing","volume":"519 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human labour has always been essential in manufacturing and, still, no machine or robot can replace innate human complex physical (dexterity) and cognitive (reasoning) skills. Understandably, industry has constantly sought new automation technologies and largely only concerned itself with physical health and safety issues to improve / maintain production processes, but these industrial engineering approaches have largely overshadowed our understanding of wider social and emotional issues that can also significantly impact on human-system performance and wellbeing. In the current climate, industrial automation is rapidly increasing and crucial to manufacturing competitiveness, and requires greater, closer human interaction. Consequently, people’s cognitive-affective abilities have never been more critical and there has never been a more important time to thoroughly understand them. Moreover, industrial engineers are themselves now more aware and interested in understanding how people can better perform tasks in collaboration with intelligent automation and robotics. This paper describes why industry is only now realising the need for psychology, how far research has advanced our knowledge, and how a major UK project is working to develop new human behaviour models to improve effectiveness in the design of human-robot interactions in modern production processes. As one recent anecdotal comment from a UK industrialist set out: “we don’t need ergonomics anymore – our industrial engineers can do that, we need psychology”!
“我们不再需要人体工程学,我们需要心理学!”——人机协作所需的人类分析
在制造业中,人类劳动一直是必不可少的,然而,没有机器或机器人可以取代人类与生俱来的复杂的身体(灵巧)和认知(推理)技能。可以理解的是,工业一直在寻求新的自动化技术,并且在很大程度上只关注自身的身体健康和安全问题,以改善/维护生产过程,但这些工业工程方法在很大程度上掩盖了我们对更广泛的社会和情感问题的理解,这些问题也会对人类系统的性能和健康产生重大影响。在当前的环境下,工业自动化正在迅速增加,对制造业的竞争力至关重要,需要更多、更紧密的人际互动。因此,人们的认知情感能力从来没有像现在这样重要,也从来没有像现在这样需要彻底理解它们。此外,工业工程师自己现在也更加意识到并有兴趣了解人们如何更好地与智能自动化和机器人合作完成任务。这篇论文描述了为什么工业现在才意识到对心理学的需求,研究在多大程度上提高了我们的知识,以及英国的一个主要项目如何致力于开发新的人类行为模型,以提高现代生产过程中人机交互设计的有效性。正如一位英国实业家最近发表的一篇轶事评论所言:“我们不再需要人体工程学了——我们的工业工程师可以做到这一点,我们需要心理学”!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信