Long-Term Productivity Monitoring of Multistage Wells with New Quantum Dot Technology and its Application in Xinjiang Oilfield

Yan Junhong, Pang Pei, Li Zhongbao, _. Sunxin, Tian Zhihua, Qiu Ziyao, Wang Guangyu, A. Belova
{"title":"Long-Term Productivity Monitoring of Multistage Wells with New Quantum Dot Technology and its Application in Xinjiang Oilfield","authors":"Yan Junhong, Pang Pei, Li Zhongbao, _. Sunxin, Tian Zhihua, Qiu Ziyao, Wang Guangyu, A. Belova","doi":"10.2523/iptc-23030-ea","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Traditional production logging uses cable or coiled tubing for productivity measurement. Such measurement normally requires well to be shut-in, which brings risks for field operation, especially for directional or horizontal wells; it affects normal field production management. Besides, the result only reflects production profile at one time point. The later production system adjustment or changes of water production value need to be measured again, eventually increasing the total cost.\n Productivity monitoring technology based on ‘Quantum Dot’ tracers uses nano-size quantum dots to make micron-size quantum signature codes or marker-reporters. As the basic monitoring particle, the quantum signature code can be made to flake quantum dot monitoring tape through polymer materials, this special tape is wrapped around pipe or screen and placed at target location in the borehole. For different layers and fluid phases, quantum monitoring tapes with different codes and affinity properties are utilized to distinguish them. When monitoring tapes come into contact with different fluids such as oil or water in formation, diffusion channels will be generated, from which quantum monitoring particles (marker-reporters) are released and adsorbed on the surface of the material. As fluid flows, quantum monitoring particles in monitoring tapes will be continually released and adsorbed on tapes surface and carried to the wellbore, this achieves a release process proportional to flow rate. The produced liquid collected at wellhead is mixed with quantum monitoring particles with various codes, which can be separated by laboratory analysis. By counting the percentage of marker-reporters with different codes, the production rate percentage of different intervals can be obtained, and then for each stage, oil, gas, and water production can be obtained according to the total wellhead production. The quantity of quantum monitoring particles is massive, and its release rate is in a positive correlation to flow rate. Under normal circumstances, unlimited production monitoring can be achieved within 3 years.\n Traditional production logging measure formation and production parameters such as temperature, pressure, density, resistivity, flow rate, water cut etc. logging tools and packers are combined to measure flow volume from each stage and fluid types are identified at wellhead.\n Main disadvantage of this method is the requirement for wellbore shut-in and the risk of unsuccessful RIH the tools as the wellbore faces common issue – wellbore deformation.\n In addition, it is not normal using packers to isolate other zones while allowing only one stage to produce. Also, production logging can only obtain inflow profile at a specific time or short period of time. If one needs to get information such as later production data or water cut value when producing system is adjusted or changed, logging operation must be done again. It results in higher costs.\n How to monitor production profile of each stages any time during normal production process and utilize these data to make timely adjustment is of great significance in terms of operation and efficient development of single well or for a whole block.","PeriodicalId":283978,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","volume":"259 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Wed, March 01, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-23030-ea","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional production logging uses cable or coiled tubing for productivity measurement. Such measurement normally requires well to be shut-in, which brings risks for field operation, especially for directional or horizontal wells; it affects normal field production management. Besides, the result only reflects production profile at one time point. The later production system adjustment or changes of water production value need to be measured again, eventually increasing the total cost. Productivity monitoring technology based on ‘Quantum Dot’ tracers uses nano-size quantum dots to make micron-size quantum signature codes or marker-reporters. As the basic monitoring particle, the quantum signature code can be made to flake quantum dot monitoring tape through polymer materials, this special tape is wrapped around pipe or screen and placed at target location in the borehole. For different layers and fluid phases, quantum monitoring tapes with different codes and affinity properties are utilized to distinguish them. When monitoring tapes come into contact with different fluids such as oil or water in formation, diffusion channels will be generated, from which quantum monitoring particles (marker-reporters) are released and adsorbed on the surface of the material. As fluid flows, quantum monitoring particles in monitoring tapes will be continually released and adsorbed on tapes surface and carried to the wellbore, this achieves a release process proportional to flow rate. The produced liquid collected at wellhead is mixed with quantum monitoring particles with various codes, which can be separated by laboratory analysis. By counting the percentage of marker-reporters with different codes, the production rate percentage of different intervals can be obtained, and then for each stage, oil, gas, and water production can be obtained according to the total wellhead production. The quantity of quantum monitoring particles is massive, and its release rate is in a positive correlation to flow rate. Under normal circumstances, unlimited production monitoring can be achieved within 3 years. Traditional production logging measure formation and production parameters such as temperature, pressure, density, resistivity, flow rate, water cut etc. logging tools and packers are combined to measure flow volume from each stage and fluid types are identified at wellhead. Main disadvantage of this method is the requirement for wellbore shut-in and the risk of unsuccessful RIH the tools as the wellbore faces common issue – wellbore deformation. In addition, it is not normal using packers to isolate other zones while allowing only one stage to produce. Also, production logging can only obtain inflow profile at a specific time or short period of time. If one needs to get information such as later production data or water cut value when producing system is adjusted or changed, logging operation must be done again. It results in higher costs. How to monitor production profile of each stages any time during normal production process and utilize these data to make timely adjustment is of great significance in terms of operation and efficient development of single well or for a whole block.
新量子点技术多级井产能长期监测及其在新疆油田的应用
传统的生产测井使用电缆或连续油管进行产能测量。这种测量通常需要关井,这给现场作业带来了风险,特别是对于定向井或水平井;影响油田正常的生产管理。此外,该结果仅反映了一个时间点的生产概况。后期的生产系统调整或产水价值的变化需要再次测量,最终增加了总成本。基于“量子点”示踪剂的生产力监测技术使用纳米级量子点来制造微米级的量子签名码或标记报告。量子签名码作为基本的监测粒子,可以通过高分子材料制成片状量子点监测带,这种特殊的监控带包裹在管道或屏幕上,放置在井眼内的目标位置。对于不同的层和流体相,采用具有不同编码和亲和特性的量子监控磁带进行区分。当监控磁带与地层中的油或水等不同流体接触时,会产生扩散通道,量子监控粒子(标记报告者)从扩散通道中释放出来并吸附在材料表面。随着流体的流动,监测带中的量子监测粒子会不断被释放并吸附在监测带表面并携带到井筒中,实现了与流速成正比的释放过程。井口收集的产出液与具有各种编码的量子监测粒子混合,可通过实验室分析分离。通过统计不同编码的标记报告器的百分比,可以得到不同层段的产量百分比,然后根据井口总产量计算出每一级的油、气、水产量。量子监测粒子数量巨大,其释放速率与流速成正相关。一般情况下,3年内可实现无限量生产监控。传统的生产测井测量地层和生产参数,如温度、压力、密度、电阻率、流量、含水率等,测井工具和封隔器相结合,测量每一级的流量,并在井口识别流体类型。该方法的主要缺点是需要关井,并且由于井筒面临井筒变形这一常见问题,因此RIH工具存在不成功的风险。此外,在只允许一级生产的情况下,使用封隔器隔离其他层是不正常的。此外,生产测井只能获得特定时间或短时间内的流入剖面。如果需要在调整或改变生产系统时获取后期生产数据或含水值等信息,则必须重新进行测井作业。这导致了更高的成本。如何在正常生产过程中随时监测各段的生产剖面,并利用这些数据及时进行调整,对于单井或整个区块的作业和高效开发都具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信