Concept for Evaluation of Techniques for Trajectory Distance Measures

Douglas Alves Peixoto, Han Su, Nguyen Quoc Viet Hung, Bela Stantic, Bolong Zheng, Xiaofang Zhou
{"title":"Concept for Evaluation of Techniques for Trajectory Distance Measures","authors":"Douglas Alves Peixoto, Han Su, Nguyen Quoc Viet Hung, Bela Stantic, Bolong Zheng, Xiaofang Zhou","doi":"10.1109/MDM.2018.00048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring the similarity (or distance) between trajectories of moving objects is a common procedure taken by most trajectory data-driven applications. One of the biggest challenges of trajectory distances measurement is that the distance needs to be carefully defined in order to reflect the true underlying similarity. This is due to the fact that trajectories are essentially non-uniform sequential data with variable length, attached with both spatial and temporal attributes, which may or may not be considered for similarity measures. Therefore, tens of similarity measures for trajectory data have been proposed; every technique claim an advantage over the others in a different aspect. Hence, it's difficult for users to choose the best-suited technique, as well as the appropriate parameter values, since each technique has distinct performance and characteristics depending on various factors. In this paper, we develop an application that allows to evaluate several techniques in different aspects (accuracy, sensitivity to trajectory features, performance, etc.). We believe that this tool will be able to serve as a practical guideline for both researchers and developers. While researchers can use our tool to assess existing or new techniques, developers can reuse its components to reduce the development complexity.","PeriodicalId":205319,"journal":{"name":"2018 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 19th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MDM.2018.00048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Measuring the similarity (or distance) between trajectories of moving objects is a common procedure taken by most trajectory data-driven applications. One of the biggest challenges of trajectory distances measurement is that the distance needs to be carefully defined in order to reflect the true underlying similarity. This is due to the fact that trajectories are essentially non-uniform sequential data with variable length, attached with both spatial and temporal attributes, which may or may not be considered for similarity measures. Therefore, tens of similarity measures for trajectory data have been proposed; every technique claim an advantage over the others in a different aspect. Hence, it's difficult for users to choose the best-suited technique, as well as the appropriate parameter values, since each technique has distinct performance and characteristics depending on various factors. In this paper, we develop an application that allows to evaluate several techniques in different aspects (accuracy, sensitivity to trajectory features, performance, etc.). We believe that this tool will be able to serve as a practical guideline for both researchers and developers. While researchers can use our tool to assess existing or new techniques, developers can reuse its components to reduce the development complexity.
弹道距离测量技术评价的概念
测量运动物体轨迹之间的相似性(或距离)是大多数轨迹数据驱动应用程序所采取的常见步骤。弹道距离测量的最大挑战之一是需要仔细定义距离,以反映真正的潜在相似性。这是因为轨迹本质上是具有可变长度的非均匀序列数据,附带空间和时间属性,这可能会或可能不会被考虑用于相似性度量。为此,提出了数十种弹道数据相似度测度;每种技术都声称在不同方面优于其他技术。因此,用户很难选择最适合的技术以及合适的参数值,因为每种技术根据各种因素具有不同的性能和特征。在本文中,我们开发了一个应用程序,允许在不同方面评估几种技术(精度,对轨迹特征的敏感性,性能等)。我们相信这个工具将能够作为研究人员和开发人员的实用指南。研究人员可以使用我们的工具来评估现有的或新的技术,开发人员可以重用它的组件来减少开发的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信