Caring Conversation Framework to promote person centred care: synthesising qualitative findings from a multi- phase programme of research

B. Dewar, C. Sharp, K. Barrie, Tamsin MacBride, Julienne Meyer
{"title":"Caring Conversation Framework to promote person centred care: synthesising qualitative findings from a multi- phase programme of research","authors":"B. Dewar, C. Sharp, K. Barrie, Tamsin MacBride, Julienne Meyer","doi":"10.5750/IJPCM.V7I1.619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background \n \nLittle is known about how to support practitioners to enhance their interpersonal conversations to be more compassionate, person centred and relational with others. The Caring Conversations (CC) framework was empirically derived to address this issue and comprises seven attributes (be courageous, connect emotionally, be curious, consider other perspectives, collaborate, compromise and celebrate). \n \nObjective \n \nThis paper synthesises the qualitative findings from a multi-phase programme of research, which implemented the CC framework across a variety of health and social care settings (acute hospitals, community, and residential care). It explores the perceived impact of the CC framework on staff and their practice. \n \nMethods \n \nSecondary analysis was conducted on the qualitative findings in the final reports of 5 studies, involved in the implementation of the CC framework. \n \nResults \n \nThe analysis showed consistent positive outcomes for staff in their interactions with patients, families and others; including greater self-awareness during interactions, development of stronger relationships, and more open dialogue that supports relational practice. The secondary analysis confirmed the applicability of the framework across a number of different settings, strengthened confidence in its value, generated fresh insights to inform further research, and developed a deeper insight into the attributes of the framework and its application. \n \nConclusions \n \nPolicy and research advocate compassionate care and relational practice, but do not state how this can be delivered in practice. By synthesising the findings from 5 studies undertaken in a variety of different settings, we can be more confident in the value of the CC framework to ensure best practice.","PeriodicalId":402902,"journal":{"name":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","volume":"1005 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"the International Journal of Person-Centered Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/IJPCM.V7I1.619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background Little is known about how to support practitioners to enhance their interpersonal conversations to be more compassionate, person centred and relational with others. The Caring Conversations (CC) framework was empirically derived to address this issue and comprises seven attributes (be courageous, connect emotionally, be curious, consider other perspectives, collaborate, compromise and celebrate). Objective This paper synthesises the qualitative findings from a multi-phase programme of research, which implemented the CC framework across a variety of health and social care settings (acute hospitals, community, and residential care). It explores the perceived impact of the CC framework on staff and their practice. Methods Secondary analysis was conducted on the qualitative findings in the final reports of 5 studies, involved in the implementation of the CC framework. Results The analysis showed consistent positive outcomes for staff in their interactions with patients, families and others; including greater self-awareness during interactions, development of stronger relationships, and more open dialogue that supports relational practice. The secondary analysis confirmed the applicability of the framework across a number of different settings, strengthened confidence in its value, generated fresh insights to inform further research, and developed a deeper insight into the attributes of the framework and its application. Conclusions Policy and research advocate compassionate care and relational practice, but do not state how this can be delivered in practice. By synthesising the findings from 5 studies undertaken in a variety of different settings, we can be more confident in the value of the CC framework to ensure best practice.
促进以人为本的关怀对话框架:综合多阶段研究项目的定性结果
关于如何支持从业者加强他们的人际对话,使他们更富有同情心,以人为本,与他人建立关系,人们知之甚少。关怀对话(CC)框架是根据经验得出的,旨在解决这个问题,它包括七个属性(勇敢、情感联系、好奇、考虑其他观点、合作、妥协和庆祝)。本文综合了一个多阶段研究项目的定性结果,该项目在各种卫生和社会护理环境(急性医院、社区和寄宿护理)中实施了CC框架。它探讨了CC框架对工作人员及其实践的感知影响。方法对参与CC框架实施的5项研究的最终报告的定性结果进行二次分析。结果分析显示,工作人员在与患者、家属和其他人的互动中取得了一致的积极成果;包括在互动中更强的自我意识,发展更牢固的关系,以及支持关系实践的更开放的对话。二次分析证实了该框架在许多不同环境中的适用性,增强了对其价值的信心,产生了新的见解,为进一步的研究提供了信息,并对框架的属性及其应用有了更深入的了解。政策和研究提倡同情关怀和关系实践,但没有说明如何在实践中实现这一点。通过综合在各种不同环境下进行的5项研究的结果,我们可以对CC框架的价值更有信心,以确保最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信