INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF EXPLICIT PHONETIC INSTRUCTION IN INTELLIGIBLE AND NATIVE-LIKE PRONUNCIATION DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF ENGLISH DIPHTHONG AND INDONESIAN LEARNERS OF ENGLISH

Tara Mustikaning Palupi
{"title":"INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF EXPLICIT PHONETIC INSTRUCTION IN INTELLIGIBLE AND NATIVE-LIKE PRONUNCIATION DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF ENGLISH DIPHTHONG AND INDONESIAN LEARNERS OF ENGLISH","authors":"Tara Mustikaning Palupi","doi":"10.47007/edu.v7i01.4644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates the effect of explicit phonetic instruction on L2 pronunciation adopting two outcome measurements (i.e. rubric of intelligibility and accentedness). Ten native Indonesian students from English Phonology class participated in this study. They were randomly selected and divided into two groups; the experimental group and the control group and did pre-test as their entry points. After they received three hours of instruction in a classroom based setting with target pronunciation of English segmental diphthongs [aʊ], [aɪ], and [ɔɪ], and recorded their speech samples, three Native English listeners evaluated their speeches. The results suggest that explicit phonetic instruction had significant effect on the diphthongs production and intelligibility especially on the controlled level speech (sentence reading task) however, only slight reduction of foreign accent was found in this study. It is also found that most students mispronounced the diphthongs: a) [aɪ] as in night was pronounced [eɪ], b) [aɪ] in time was pronounced [e], c) [aʊ] in house, shout, brown, nded, was pronounced as [ɔ], d) [aʊ] in sounded was pronounced as [ɔʊ] and [ɔ] but no results were found when participants mispronouncing diphthong [ɔɪ]. Moreover, the data shown that participants still have a segmental problem in the pronunciation of [aɪ] in the spontaneous speech level (picture description task). Additionally, it is evident from the analysis that that explicit instruction outperformed the participants’ intelligibility in the experimental group specifically at the controlled speech level or on sentence-reading task. Furthermore, the present study illustrated that Native English (NE) listeners rated students’ speeches more strictly in the domain of intelligibility than accentedness both in sentence-reading task and picture description task. The data from findings confirmed that even accented speech can be intelligible for NE listeners and proved that segmental aspect is the major source affecting pronunciation features for communication breakdown.","PeriodicalId":197202,"journal":{"name":"Eduscience : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","volume":"471 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eduscience : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47007/edu.v7i01.4644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research investigates the effect of explicit phonetic instruction on L2 pronunciation adopting two outcome measurements (i.e. rubric of intelligibility and accentedness). Ten native Indonesian students from English Phonology class participated in this study. They were randomly selected and divided into two groups; the experimental group and the control group and did pre-test as their entry points. After they received three hours of instruction in a classroom based setting with target pronunciation of English segmental diphthongs [aʊ], [aɪ], and [ɔɪ], and recorded their speech samples, three Native English listeners evaluated their speeches. The results suggest that explicit phonetic instruction had significant effect on the diphthongs production and intelligibility especially on the controlled level speech (sentence reading task) however, only slight reduction of foreign accent was found in this study. It is also found that most students mispronounced the diphthongs: a) [aɪ] as in night was pronounced [eɪ], b) [aɪ] in time was pronounced [e], c) [aʊ] in house, shout, brown, nded, was pronounced as [ɔ], d) [aʊ] in sounded was pronounced as [ɔʊ] and [ɔ] but no results were found when participants mispronouncing diphthong [ɔɪ]. Moreover, the data shown that participants still have a segmental problem in the pronunciation of [aɪ] in the spontaneous speech level (picture description task). Additionally, it is evident from the analysis that that explicit instruction outperformed the participants’ intelligibility in the experimental group specifically at the controlled speech level or on sentence-reading task. Furthermore, the present study illustrated that Native English (NE) listeners rated students’ speeches more strictly in the domain of intelligibility than accentedness both in sentence-reading task and picture description task. The data from findings confirmed that even accented speech can be intelligible for NE listeners and proved that segmental aspect is the major source affecting pronunciation features for communication breakdown.
研究显性语音教学在可理解性和母语发音发展中的作用:英语双元音和印度尼西亚英语学习者的案例
本研究采用两种结果测量方法(即可读性指标和重音性指标)来考察显性语音教学对二语发音的影响。10名来自英语音系班的印尼籍学生参与了本研究。他们被随机选择并分为两组;实验组和对照组做了预测试作为他们的切入点。他们在课堂上接受了三个小时的英语双元音[a], [a /]和[a /]的目标发音指导,并记录了他们的语音样本,三位母语为英语的听众对他们的演讲进行了评估。结果表明,显性语音教学对双元音的产生和可理解性有显著的影响,尤其是在控制水平语音(句子阅读任务)上,但在本研究中只发现了轻微的外国口音的减少。研究还发现,大多数学生读错了双元音:a) [a æ]在night中被读成[e æ], b) [a æ]在time中被读成[e], c) [a æ]在house、shout、brown、nded中被读成[j], d) [a æ]在sounds中被读成[j]和[j],但当参与者读错双元音[j]时,没有发现结果。此外,数据显示,在自发语音水平(图片描述任务)中,参与者在[a /]的发音上仍然存在分词问题。此外,从分析中可以明显看出,明确的指导在实验组中表现得更好,特别是在受控语音水平或句子阅读任务上。此外,本研究还表明,在句子阅读任务和图片描述任务中,母语英语(NE)听众对学生演讲的可理解性的评价比口音更严格。研究结果的数据证实,即使是带口音的语音也可以被新语习得者理解,并证明了分词方面是影响沟通破裂的发音特征的主要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信