Memaknai Delik Dan Delik Tata Negara

Sarip Sarip
{"title":"Memaknai Delik Dan Delik Tata Negara","authors":"Sarip Sarip","doi":"10.30596/DLL.V4I2.3128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The term delik is still identified with criminal law, the offense itself comes from delict in various legal literatures. That according to the positive law a strafbaar feit is actually nothing other than an action which according to a formulation of the law has been declared a punitive action. The thought that was considered wrong in learning stated that the term delict was criminal. The wrong terminology eventually spread among the students who always named delict as a criminal. Research on interpreting delicts and state administration offenses is a study carried out using old literature. Old literature has been chosen to strengthen the argument in finding a bright spot about the meaning of the offense itself. Writing defines offenses and constitutional offenses including in normative legal research carried out through various efforts to thoroughly examine and analyze legal provisions relating to research problems (study of law in the book). Through the meaning in the discussion it was found that the meaning of offense is basically not limited to criminal matters but can also be used in the meaning of state administration. So in constitutional offenses, an offense is used to gain power or maintain power. In addition, state administration offenses cannot be separated from the sovereignty theory itself. Then it can be concluded that the meaning of offense at this time is only trapped in a criminal that actually has a neutral meaning that is not limited to criminal matters.","PeriodicalId":158962,"journal":{"name":"DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30596/DLL.V4I2.3128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The term delik is still identified with criminal law, the offense itself comes from delict in various legal literatures. That according to the positive law a strafbaar feit is actually nothing other than an action which according to a formulation of the law has been declared a punitive action. The thought that was considered wrong in learning stated that the term delict was criminal. The wrong terminology eventually spread among the students who always named delict as a criminal. Research on interpreting delicts and state administration offenses is a study carried out using old literature. Old literature has been chosen to strengthen the argument in finding a bright spot about the meaning of the offense itself. Writing defines offenses and constitutional offenses including in normative legal research carried out through various efforts to thoroughly examine and analyze legal provisions relating to research problems (study of law in the book). Through the meaning in the discussion it was found that the meaning of offense is basically not limited to criminal matters but can also be used in the meaning of state administration. So in constitutional offenses, an offense is used to gain power or maintain power. In addition, state administration offenses cannot be separated from the sovereignty theory itself. Then it can be concluded that the meaning of offense at this time is only trapped in a criminal that actually has a neutral meaning that is not limited to criminal matters.
“delik”一词至今仍与刑法相联系,其犯罪本身在各种法律文献中来自于“delict”。根据实在法,strafbaar feit实际上只不过是一种行为,根据法律的表述,它被宣布为一种惩罚行为。在学习中被认为是错误的思想认为,“delict”一词是犯罪的。错误的术语最终在学生中传播开来,学生们总是把违法者称为罪犯。不法行为和国家行政违法的解释研究是一项利用旧文献进行的研究。我们选择了古老的文献来加强这一论点,以找到关于冒犯本身意义的亮点。写作定义了罪行和宪法罪行,包括在规范性法律研究中,通过各种努力彻底检查和分析与研究问题有关的法律条款(书中的法律研究)。通过讨论中的含义发现,犯罪的含义基本上不局限于刑事事项,也可以用于国家行政的含义。因此,在宪法犯罪中,犯罪是用来获得权力或维持权力的。此外,国家行政违法也不能脱离主权理论本身。那么可以得出结论,此时的犯罪的含义只局限于一种实际上具有不局限于刑事事项的中性意义的犯罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信