Economic Impact of Therapeutic Choices: The Case of Incretins

R. Ravasio
{"title":"Economic Impact of Therapeutic Choices: The Case of Incretins","authors":"R. Ravasio","doi":"10.5301/GRHTA.5000181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this economic evaluation was to compare two alternative therapeutic regimens for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: basal-bolus insulin vs basal insulin and DPP-4. We conducted a Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA) to compare the annual cost of basal-bolus insulin regimen vs basal insulin and DPP-4 regimen from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS). The CMA considered only direct medical costs (basal insulin, bolus insulin and DPP-4 [sitagliptin] and self-monitoring of glycemic control). Costs were assessed in 2014 Euros. Sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis on key economic parameters were performed. The expected annual cost (per patient) was €987.60 with basal insulin and DPP-4 and €1,568.23 with basal-bolus insulin. As a consequence of a significant reduction of glycemic control costs, the regimen with DPP-4 was a cost-saving alternative from the perspective of the Italian NHS.","PeriodicalId":228031,"journal":{"name":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":"295 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global and Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/GRHTA.5000181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this economic evaluation was to compare two alternative therapeutic regimens for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: basal-bolus insulin vs basal insulin and DPP-4. We conducted a Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA) to compare the annual cost of basal-bolus insulin regimen vs basal insulin and DPP-4 regimen from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (NHS). The CMA considered only direct medical costs (basal insulin, bolus insulin and DPP-4 [sitagliptin] and self-monitoring of glycemic control). Costs were assessed in 2014 Euros. Sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis on key economic parameters were performed. The expected annual cost (per patient) was €987.60 with basal insulin and DPP-4 and €1,568.23 with basal-bolus insulin. As a consequence of a significant reduction of glycemic control costs, the regimen with DPP-4 was a cost-saving alternative from the perspective of the Italian NHS.
治疗选择的经济影响:肠促胰岛素的案例
这项经济评估的目的是比较治疗2型糖尿病的两种替代治疗方案:基础胰岛素注射与基础胰岛素和DPP-4。我们进行了成本最小化分析(CMA),从意大利国家卫生服务(NHS)的角度比较基础胰岛素方案与基础胰岛素和DPP-4方案的年成本。CMA只考虑了直接医疗费用(基础胰岛素,胰岛素和DPP-4[西格列汀]和自我血糖控制监测)。费用以2014年欧元计算。对关键经济参数进行了敏感性分析和阈值分析。基础胰岛素和DPP-4组的预期年费用(每位患者)为987.60欧元,基础胰岛素组为1568.23欧元。由于血糖控制成本的显著降低,从意大利NHS的角度来看,DPP-4方案是一种节省成本的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信