Risks to the Public

P. Neumann
{"title":"Risks to the Public","authors":"P. Neumann","doi":"10.1145/3587062.3587063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the risks before you leap seems like a use- ful mantra. Sadly, it seems to be ignored by people who develop automated vehicles, ChatGPT, sensitive uses of arti- cial intelligence, cryptocurrencies, and many other systems that frequentl appear in this section. Almost everything to- day seems to have dual-use issues, in the sense of having both up-sides and down-sides. I believe you all have certainly got- ten that message. However, it needs to reach more widely, Not only is it widely ignored overall, the notion of ground truth seems to have disappeared when it comes to conspiracy theories and rampant disinformation. ChatGPT is just the latest challenge, as noted by the remarkable urry of RISKS posts in this issue largely negative.","PeriodicalId":432885,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3587062.3587063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Considering the risks before you leap seems like a use- ful mantra. Sadly, it seems to be ignored by people who develop automated vehicles, ChatGPT, sensitive uses of arti- cial intelligence, cryptocurrencies, and many other systems that frequentl appear in this section. Almost everything to- day seems to have dual-use issues, in the sense of having both up-sides and down-sides. I believe you all have certainly got- ten that message. However, it needs to reach more widely, Not only is it widely ignored overall, the notion of ground truth seems to have disappeared when it comes to conspiracy theories and rampant disinformation. ChatGPT is just the latest challenge, as noted by the remarkable urry of RISKS posts in this issue largely negative.
对公众的风险
三思而后行似乎是个有用的咒语。可悲的是,开发自动驾驶汽车、ChatGPT、人工智能的敏感用途、加密货币和许多经常出现在本节中的其他系统的人似乎忽视了这一点。今天几乎所有的东西似乎都有双重用途的问题,既有好处也有坏处。我相信你们都已经明白了这个信息。然而,它需要更广泛地传播,不仅总体上被广泛忽视,而且当涉及阴谋论和猖獗的虚假信息时,地面真相的概念似乎已经消失了。ChatGPT只是最新的挑战,正如本期《风险》杂志中大量负面的文章所指出的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信