Mepacrine hydrochloride in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. A controlled randomized trial.

J Mejer, K M Mortensen, H H Hansen
{"title":"Mepacrine hydrochloride in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. A controlled randomized trial.","authors":"J Mejer,&nbsp;K M Mortensen,&nbsp;H H Hansen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effect of local instillation of mepacrine hydrochloride (quinacrine hydrochloride U.S.P., Atabrine) was compared with triethylenethiophosphoramide (Thiotepa) applied locally and with pleurocentesis alone. Twentyfive patients with disseminated malignant disease were allocated at random to one of these three treatments. A finding of more than 500 ml effusion within 3 months of instituting treatment was regarded as a failure, and subsequently one of the other treatments was used at random. Sixty-four per cent of the patients treated with mepacrine responded, compared with 27% treated with triethylenethiophosphoramide, and 11% treated with pleurocentesis alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":21508,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of respiratory diseases","volume":"58 6","pages":"319-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1977-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of respiratory diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effect of local instillation of mepacrine hydrochloride (quinacrine hydrochloride U.S.P., Atabrine) was compared with triethylenethiophosphoramide (Thiotepa) applied locally and with pleurocentesis alone. Twentyfive patients with disseminated malignant disease were allocated at random to one of these three treatments. A finding of more than 500 ml effusion within 3 months of instituting treatment was regarded as a failure, and subsequently one of the other treatments was used at random. Sixty-four per cent of the patients treated with mepacrine responded, compared with 27% treated with triethylenethiophosphoramide, and 11% treated with pleurocentesis alone.

盐酸甲哌辛治疗恶性胸腔积液。一项对照随机试验。
比较局部滴注盐酸甲哌卡因(quinacrine hydrochloride U.S.P, Atabrine)与局部应用三乙烯埃塞俄比亚磷酰胺(Thiotepa)和单独胸膜穿刺术的效果。25例弥漫性恶性疾病患者随机分配到这三种治疗方法中的一种。在开始治疗的3个月内发现超过500毫升的积液被视为失败,随后随机使用其他一种治疗方法。接受甲哌辛治疗的患者有64%的应答,而接受三乙烯埃塞俄比亚磷酰胺治疗的患者有27%应答,单独接受胸膜穿刺术治疗的患者有11%应答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书