Rejection of Subjective Law as a Manifestation of Dispositivity in Domestic Criminal Proceedings: History and Modernity

I. Chebotareva, O. Pashutina
{"title":"Rejection of Subjective Law as a Manifestation of Dispositivity in Domestic Criminal Proceedings: History and Modernity","authors":"I. Chebotareva, O. Pashutina","doi":"10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-141-154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. The rejection of subjective law as a form of manifestation of dispositivity is a new category for the Russian criminal procedure doctrine, the study of which is impossible without a thorough understanding of the pre-requisites for its occurrence, taking into account specific historical conditions. The study of the evolution of the legislative regulation of the rejection of subjective law allows us to trace how many steps forward the Russian legislator has made on the way to providing participants in criminal proceedings with the opportunity to protect their rights and interests, what adjustments the current state of criminal proceedings requires. The purpose of the research is to gain knowledge about the stages of the origin of the phenomenon of rejection of subjective law, the creation of theoretical prerequisites for further research of its legal nature, forms and methods of implementation, the development of improving the mechanism of legal regulation. Objectives: based on the analysis of the provisions of the criminal procedure law of the Soviet and post-Soviet period, to investigate the process of the origin of the rejection of subjective law in the criminal process of Russia, to identify the impact of political and socio-economic transformations on its development. Methodology. The methodological basis of the research is the provisions of the general scientific dialectical method of cognition of the surrounding reality in its connection and interaction, the general scientific system approach. In the course of the work, formal legal and historical methods were used. Results. The criminal process of modern Russia, unlike the one that existed earlier, is built in accordance with the constitutional provision on the priority of individual rights. The phenomenon of rejection of subjective law occupies an important place in the system of guarantees for ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings. Conclusion. The fundamental transformations that took place in Russia at the end of the last century in political and public life naturally affected the entire legal system and, among other things, had a great impact on the sphere of criminal proceedings. Dispositivity has become one of the key legal ideas, and the rejection of subjective law, as a form of its manifestation, has taken its due place in the system of regulation of criminal procedural relations.","PeriodicalId":359562,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-141-154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. The rejection of subjective law as a form of manifestation of dispositivity is a new category for the Russian criminal procedure doctrine, the study of which is impossible without a thorough understanding of the pre-requisites for its occurrence, taking into account specific historical conditions. The study of the evolution of the legislative regulation of the rejection of subjective law allows us to trace how many steps forward the Russian legislator has made on the way to providing participants in criminal proceedings with the opportunity to protect their rights and interests, what adjustments the current state of criminal proceedings requires. The purpose of the research is to gain knowledge about the stages of the origin of the phenomenon of rejection of subjective law, the creation of theoretical prerequisites for further research of its legal nature, forms and methods of implementation, the development of improving the mechanism of legal regulation. Objectives: based on the analysis of the provisions of the criminal procedure law of the Soviet and post-Soviet period, to investigate the process of the origin of the rejection of subjective law in the criminal process of Russia, to identify the impact of political and socio-economic transformations on its development. Methodology. The methodological basis of the research is the provisions of the general scientific dialectical method of cognition of the surrounding reality in its connection and interaction, the general scientific system approach. In the course of the work, formal legal and historical methods were used. Results. The criminal process of modern Russia, unlike the one that existed earlier, is built in accordance with the constitutional provision on the priority of individual rights. The phenomenon of rejection of subjective law occupies an important place in the system of guarantees for ensuring the rights and legitimate interests of participants in criminal proceedings. Conclusion. The fundamental transformations that took place in Russia at the end of the last century in political and public life naturally affected the entire legal system and, among other things, had a great impact on the sphere of criminal proceedings. Dispositivity has become one of the key legal ideas, and the rejection of subjective law, as a form of its manifestation, has taken its due place in the system of regulation of criminal procedural relations.
国内刑事诉讼中对主观性法的否定:历史与现代性
的相关性。对主观性法作为处置权表现形式的否定是俄罗斯刑事诉讼主义的一个新范畴,对其研究离不开对其产生的前提条件的深入了解,也离不开对具体历史条件的考虑。通过对主观法否定立法规制演变的研究,我们可以追溯俄罗斯立法者在为刑事诉讼参与人提供保护其权益的机会的道路上向前迈出了多少步,刑事诉讼的现状需要做出哪些调整。研究的目的在于了解主观法排斥现象产生的各个阶段,为进一步研究其法律性质、实施形式和方法、完善法律规制机制创造理论前提。目的:在分析苏联和后苏联时期刑事诉讼法规定的基础上,考察俄罗斯刑事诉讼中拒绝主观法的起源过程,确定政治和社会经济转型对其发展的影响。方法。这一研究的方法论基础是关于认识周围实在的联系和相互作用的一般科学辩证方法的规定,即一般科学的系统方法。在工作过程中,使用了正式的法律和历史方法。结果。现代俄罗斯的刑事诉讼程序与以往不同,是根据宪法关于个人权利优先的规定建立起来的。主观法否定现象在保障刑事诉讼参与人合法权益的保障制度中占有重要地位。结论。上世纪末俄罗斯在政治和公共生活中发生的根本变革自然影响到整个法律制度,除其他外,对刑事诉讼领域产生了重大影响。处分权已成为重要的法律理念之一,对主观性法的否定作为其表现形式,在刑事诉讼关系规制体系中占据了应有的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信