On the Comparison of Mono Visual Odometry Front End in Low Texture Environment

Xianyu Wang, Qimin Li, Zhiwei Lin
{"title":"On the Comparison of Mono Visual Odometry Front End in Low Texture Environment","authors":"Xianyu Wang, Qimin Li, Zhiwei Lin","doi":"10.1109/ICMRA51221.2020.9398353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual odometry is the process of determining the position and orientation of a vehicle using associated camera images. As we known, the quality of outcomes of the six degrees-of-freedom (DoF) poses created by visual odometry play a decisive role in autonomous location, map creating, and path planning in SLAM system. While different approaches for handling the monocular visual odometry have been used in practice, but few previous studies have been carried out to systematically analyze their differences, especially in a repeat scene or a low texture environment which detect a small amount of feature points. In this paper, we present the comparative analysis of ORB feature detection and matching, and Shi-Tomasi detection and optical flow matching in visual odometry front end process. We briefly introduce the commonly used Perspective-n-Point (PnP) methods and experimentally compare three PnP approaches: based on linear method DLT, EPnP, and Bundle Adjustment (BA) which based on nonlinear optimization method. We built a simulation data set to evaluate those PnP approaches, and finally sum up an optimal combination of visual front-end in the area of low texture environment based on the calculation efficiency, reliability and accuracy.","PeriodicalId":160127,"journal":{"name":"2020 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation (ICMRA)","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 3rd International Conference on Mechatronics, Robotics and Automation (ICMRA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMRA51221.2020.9398353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual odometry is the process of determining the position and orientation of a vehicle using associated camera images. As we known, the quality of outcomes of the six degrees-of-freedom (DoF) poses created by visual odometry play a decisive role in autonomous location, map creating, and path planning in SLAM system. While different approaches for handling the monocular visual odometry have been used in practice, but few previous studies have been carried out to systematically analyze their differences, especially in a repeat scene or a low texture environment which detect a small amount of feature points. In this paper, we present the comparative analysis of ORB feature detection and matching, and Shi-Tomasi detection and optical flow matching in visual odometry front end process. We briefly introduce the commonly used Perspective-n-Point (PnP) methods and experimentally compare three PnP approaches: based on linear method DLT, EPnP, and Bundle Adjustment (BA) which based on nonlinear optimization method. We built a simulation data set to evaluate those PnP approaches, and finally sum up an optimal combination of visual front-end in the area of low texture environment based on the calculation efficiency, reliability and accuracy.
低纹理环境下单视觉测程前端的比较研究
视觉里程计是使用相关相机图像确定车辆位置和方向的过程。在SLAM系统中,由视觉里程计生成的六自由度位姿的结果质量在自动定位、地图生成和路径规划中起着决定性的作用。虽然在实践中使用了不同的方法来处理单目视觉里程计,但很少有研究系统地分析它们的差异,特别是在重复场景或低纹理环境中检测少量特征点的情况下。本文对ORB特征检测与匹配、Shi-Tomasi检测和光流匹配在视觉里程计前端过程中的应用进行了对比分析。本文简要介绍了常用的视角-n-点(PnP)方法,并对基于线性方法的DLT、EPnP和基于非线性优化方法的束调整(BA)三种PnP方法进行了实验比较。通过建立仿真数据集对这些PnP方法进行评估,最终在计算效率、可靠性和准确性的基础上,总结出低纹理环境下视觉前端的最优组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信