Introduction: A look at social problems in Southern Europe from the south

Francisco Entrena-Durán, R. Soriano-Miras, Ricardo Duque-Calvache
{"title":"Introduction: A look at social problems in Southern Europe from the south","authors":"Francisco Entrena-Durán, R. Soriano-Miras, Ricardo Duque-Calvache","doi":"10.4337/9781789901436.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social problems are socially constructed, although this does not mean that they are mere constructs or imaginaries, only existing in the minds of the social subjects that produce, perceive or live them. Although it is essential to consider subjective imaginaries (more or less incorporated by individual or group social subjects) regarding social problems to understand them, they clearly have a real basis, as their existence can be verified through empirical study of the processes through which they become subjectively perceived objective realities (Frigerio, 1995), as well as through analysis of the socio-temporal contexts in which they emerge. To a great extent, we agree with Rubington and Weinberg (2010), who differentiate two constructionist perspectives in the analysis of social problems: on one hand, a strict constructionism, focused on the subjective definition of problems, and, on the other, a contextual constructionism, which also includes the context in which these problems are produced and reproduced as an essential factor that must be considered. The subjective dimension of social problems, even if considered from the perspective of the strict constructionism that Rubington and Weinberg refer to, as a mere definition of such problems or a mental construction related to them, is as empirically verifiable and analyzable as is any objective dimension. This is because the subjective dimension can be objectified through the identification of the evaluations, representations and discourses constructed regarding specific social phenomena and circumstances that are perceived as social problems by some segment of the social subjects that voluntarily or involuntarily (or consciously or unconsciously, as well) produce and experience them (Blumer, 1971). Thus, when we refer to the social construction of social problems, we do not understand this as if it is a mere elaboration of representations of these problems (the previously mentioned mental constructs or imaginaries), as if these problems only existed in ideas and through ideas that actors have","PeriodicalId":221948,"journal":{"name":"Social Problems in Southern Europe","volume":"299 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Problems in Southern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901436.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Social problems are socially constructed, although this does not mean that they are mere constructs or imaginaries, only existing in the minds of the social subjects that produce, perceive or live them. Although it is essential to consider subjective imaginaries (more or less incorporated by individual or group social subjects) regarding social problems to understand them, they clearly have a real basis, as their existence can be verified through empirical study of the processes through which they become subjectively perceived objective realities (Frigerio, 1995), as well as through analysis of the socio-temporal contexts in which they emerge. To a great extent, we agree with Rubington and Weinberg (2010), who differentiate two constructionist perspectives in the analysis of social problems: on one hand, a strict constructionism, focused on the subjective definition of problems, and, on the other, a contextual constructionism, which also includes the context in which these problems are produced and reproduced as an essential factor that must be considered. The subjective dimension of social problems, even if considered from the perspective of the strict constructionism that Rubington and Weinberg refer to, as a mere definition of such problems or a mental construction related to them, is as empirically verifiable and analyzable as is any objective dimension. This is because the subjective dimension can be objectified through the identification of the evaluations, representations and discourses constructed regarding specific social phenomena and circumstances that are perceived as social problems by some segment of the social subjects that voluntarily or involuntarily (or consciously or unconsciously, as well) produce and experience them (Blumer, 1971). Thus, when we refer to the social construction of social problems, we do not understand this as if it is a mere elaboration of representations of these problems (the previously mentioned mental constructs or imaginaries), as if these problems only existed in ideas and through ideas that actors have
导言:从南方看南欧的社会问题
社会问题是社会建构的,尽管这并不意味着它们仅仅是建构或想象,只存在于产生、感知或生活在其中的社会主体的脑海中。虽然有必要考虑主观想象(或多或少被个人或群体社会主体所吸收)来理解社会问题,但它们显然有一个真实的基础,因为它们的存在可以通过对它们成为主观感知的客观现实的过程的实证研究来验证(Frigerio, 1995),以及通过分析它们出现的社会时间背景。在很大程度上,我们同意Rubington和Weinberg(2010)的观点,他们在分析社会问题时区分了两种建构主义观点:一方面是严格的建构主义,侧重于对问题的主观定义;另一方面是语境建构主义,它还包括这些问题产生和再现的语境,这是必须考虑的基本因素。社会问题的主观维度,即使从Rubington和Weinberg所提到的严格建构主义的角度来看,作为这些问题的纯粹定义或与之相关的心理建构,也与任何客观维度一样具有经验可验证性和可分析性。这是因为主观维度可以通过对特定社会现象和环境的评价、表征和话语的识别而被客观化,这些社会现象和环境被一些社会主体自愿或不自愿(或有意识或无意识)产生和体验它们的社会问题。因此,当我们提到社会问题的社会建构时,我们不会把它理解为仅仅是对这些问题(前面提到的心理建构或想象)的阐述,就好像这些问题只存在于思想中,并通过行动者的思想存在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信