An unnoticed strong connection between algebraic-based and protograph-based LDPC codes, Part I: Binary case and interpretation

Juane Li, Keke Liu, Shu Lin, K. Abdel-Ghaffar, W. Ryan
{"title":"An unnoticed strong connection between algebraic-based and protograph-based LDPC codes, Part I: Binary case and interpretation","authors":"Juane Li, Keke Liu, Shu Lin, K. Abdel-Ghaffar, W. Ryan","doi":"10.1109/ITA.2015.7308964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper unveils a strong connection between two major constructions of LDPC codes, namely the algebraic-based and the protograph-based constructions. It is shown that, from a graph-theoretic point of view, an algebraic LDPC code whose parity-check matrix is an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field is a protograph LDPC code. Conversely, from a matrix-theoretic point of view, since the parity-check matrix of a protograph code can be arranged as an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field and its base graph (or base matrix) can be constructed algebraically, a protograph LDPC code is an algebraic LDPC code. These two major approaches have their advantages and disadvantages in code construction. Unification of these two approaches may lead to better designs and constructions of LDPC codes to achieve good overall performance in terms of error performance in waterfall region, error-floor location and rate of decoding convergence. This paper is the first part of a series of two parts, Part-I and Part-II. Part-I investigates only the binary LDPC codes constructed by the superposition and the protograph-based methods. Part-II explores nonbinary LDPC codes from both superposition and protograph points of view. Also included in Part II are specific superposition constructions of both binary and nonbinary quasi-cyclic LDPC codes.","PeriodicalId":150850,"journal":{"name":"2015 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ITA.2015.7308964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

This paper unveils a strong connection between two major constructions of LDPC codes, namely the algebraic-based and the protograph-based constructions. It is shown that, from a graph-theoretic point of view, an algebraic LDPC code whose parity-check matrix is an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field is a protograph LDPC code. Conversely, from a matrix-theoretic point of view, since the parity-check matrix of a protograph code can be arranged as an array of submatrices of the same size over a finite field and its base graph (or base matrix) can be constructed algebraically, a protograph LDPC code is an algebraic LDPC code. These two major approaches have their advantages and disadvantages in code construction. Unification of these two approaches may lead to better designs and constructions of LDPC codes to achieve good overall performance in terms of error performance in waterfall region, error-floor location and rate of decoding convergence. This paper is the first part of a series of two parts, Part-I and Part-II. Part-I investigates only the binary LDPC codes constructed by the superposition and the protograph-based methods. Part-II explores nonbinary LDPC codes from both superposition and protograph points of view. Also included in Part II are specific superposition constructions of both binary and nonbinary quasi-cyclic LDPC codes.
一个未被注意到的基于代数和基于原型的LDPC代码之间的强连接,第一部分:二进制情况和解释
本文揭示了LDPC码的两种主要结构之间的紧密联系,即基于代数的结构和基于原型的结构。从图论的角度证明了一个代数LDPC码,其奇偶校验矩阵是有限域上相同大小的子矩阵的数组,它是一个原生LDPC码。相反,从矩阵论的观点来看,由于原生码的奇偶校验矩阵可以在有限域上排列成大小相同的子矩阵数组,并且它的基图(或基矩阵)可以代数地构造,因此原生码是代数LDPC码。这两种主要方法在代码构建方面各有优缺点。这两种方法的统一可以更好地设计和构建LDPC码,从而在瀑布区错误性能、错误层定位和译码收敛率方面获得良好的整体性能。本文是第一部分和第二部分的第一部分。第一部分只研究了用叠加和基于原型的方法构造的二进制LDPC码。第二部分从叠加和原型的角度探讨了非二进制LDPC码。第二部分还包括二进制和非二进制准循环LDPC码的特定叠加结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信