Communicating attitudes through metaphor

Jurga Cibulskienė
{"title":"Communicating attitudes through metaphor","authors":"Jurga Cibulskienė","doi":"10.1075/COGLS.00033.CIB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Metaphor analysis in real-world discourse is increasingly\n becoming the focus of many cognitive studies. Accordingly, this paper seeks to\n investigate how euro adoption in Lithuania in 2015 was metaphorically\n communicated by the media. The study is carried out within the framework of\n Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA), which was developed by Charteris-Black (2005, 2011), Musolff (2008), Hart (2010). Thus, a three-step metaphor analysis procedure\n (Identified→ Interpreted→ Explained) was employed in order to analyze the\n attitude towards euro adoption presented in Lithuanian media. The findings show\n that the euro is most frequently conceptualized as a living organism\n with different scenarios (active agent and passive agent)\n being realized linguistically. In the final stage – explanation – metaphors were\n analyzed from a rhetorical perspective, which means that an attempt was made to\n look into how metaphors communicate positive or negative attitudes about euro\n adoption in the media. The results demonstrate that personification of the euro\n makes the idea of euro adoption more understandable, it activates a range of\n emotions and evaluates it. This leads to further insights about the way the\n media exercises its power in an attempt to persuade people and manipulate their\n attitudes, emotions and opinions.","PeriodicalId":127458,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/COGLS.00033.CIB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Metaphor analysis in real-world discourse is increasingly becoming the focus of many cognitive studies. Accordingly, this paper seeks to investigate how euro adoption in Lithuania in 2015 was metaphorically communicated by the media. The study is carried out within the framework of Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA), which was developed by Charteris-Black (2005, 2011), Musolff (2008), Hart (2010). Thus, a three-step metaphor analysis procedure (Identified→ Interpreted→ Explained) was employed in order to analyze the attitude towards euro adoption presented in Lithuanian media. The findings show that the euro is most frequently conceptualized as a living organism with different scenarios (active agent and passive agent) being realized linguistically. In the final stage – explanation – metaphors were analyzed from a rhetorical perspective, which means that an attempt was made to look into how metaphors communicate positive or negative attitudes about euro adoption in the media. The results demonstrate that personification of the euro makes the idea of euro adoption more understandable, it activates a range of emotions and evaluates it. This leads to further insights about the way the media exercises its power in an attempt to persuade people and manipulate their attitudes, emotions and opinions.
通过隐喻传达态度
现实语篇中的隐喻分析日益成为认知研究的热点。因此,本文试图探讨2015年立陶宛采用欧元是如何通过媒体隐喻性地传播的。该研究是在批判性隐喻分析(CMA)的框架内进行的,该分析由Charteris-Black(2005,2011)、Musolff(2008)、Hart(2010)发展而来。因此,为了分析立陶宛媒体对欧元的态度,我们采用了三步隐喻分析程序(识别→解释→解释)。研究结果表明,欧元最常被概念化为一个具有不同情景(主动主体和被动主体)的活的有机体,在语言上被实现。在最后一个解释阶段,我们从修辞的角度分析隐喻,这意味着我们试图研究隐喻如何传达媒体对欧元采用的积极或消极态度。结果表明,欧元的人格化使人们对欧元采用的想法更容易理解,它激活了一系列的情绪并对其进行了评估。这让我们进一步了解媒体是如何行使其权力,试图说服人们,操纵他们的态度、情绪和观点的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信