Does Omission of Pharmacy Cost Affect Cost-Efficiency Rankings in Medical Clinics?

Hee-Chung Kang, Jae-Seok Hong
{"title":"Does Omission of Pharmacy Cost Affect Cost-Efficiency Rankings in Medical Clinics?","authors":"Hee-Chung Kang, Jae-Seok Hong","doi":"10.4332/KJHPA.2010.20.4.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : If different cost efficiency indexes were informed to the same clinic depending on the inclusion or exclusion of pharmacy cost, it may impair the reliability of provider-profiling system. This study aimed to investigate whether the omission of pharmacy cost affects cost-efficiency rankings in medical clinics. Methods : Data for ambulatory care cost at 23,112 medical clinics were collected from the claims database, which was constructed after review by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea in April 2007. We calculated two types of cost efficiency indexes by inclusion or exclusion of pharmacy cost for a medical clinic. The agreement between the decile rankings of the two indexes was also assessed using the weighted kappa statistic of Landis and Koch. Results : When the cost efficiency index for total cost including pharmacy cost was compared with the index for total cost excluding it, the agreement between the two indexes was only 55%. The agreements between the two indexes were relatively low within specialties which have larger pharmacy volume of total cost and lower correlation between total cost with or without pharmacy cost included than the average level of all the specialties. Conclusion : These results suggest that the omission of pharmacy cost may result in contradictory outcomes that may be confusing to a medical institution and may impair the reliability of provider-profiling systems. It is very important to standardize profiling criteria for the reliability of provider profiling system.","PeriodicalId":253456,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2010.20.4.045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : If different cost efficiency indexes were informed to the same clinic depending on the inclusion or exclusion of pharmacy cost, it may impair the reliability of provider-profiling system. This study aimed to investigate whether the omission of pharmacy cost affects cost-efficiency rankings in medical clinics. Methods : Data for ambulatory care cost at 23,112 medical clinics were collected from the claims database, which was constructed after review by the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) of Korea in April 2007. We calculated two types of cost efficiency indexes by inclusion or exclusion of pharmacy cost for a medical clinic. The agreement between the decile rankings of the two indexes was also assessed using the weighted kappa statistic of Landis and Koch. Results : When the cost efficiency index for total cost including pharmacy cost was compared with the index for total cost excluding it, the agreement between the two indexes was only 55%. The agreements between the two indexes were relatively low within specialties which have larger pharmacy volume of total cost and lower correlation between total cost with or without pharmacy cost included than the average level of all the specialties. Conclusion : These results suggest that the omission of pharmacy cost may result in contradictory outcomes that may be confusing to a medical institution and may impair the reliability of provider-profiling systems. It is very important to standardize profiling criteria for the reliability of provider profiling system.
医药费用的遗漏是否影响医疗诊所的成本效益排名?
背景:同一诊所因纳入或排除药费而被告知不同的成本效率指标,可能会影响提供者档案系统的可靠性。本研究旨在探讨药房成本的遗漏是否影响医疗诊所的成本效益排名。方法:从2007年4月韩国健康保险审查和评估服务中心(HIRA)审查后构建的索赔数据库中收集23,112家医疗诊所的门诊费用数据。我们通过纳入或排除医疗诊所的药费计算了两种类型的成本效率指数。采用兰迪斯和科赫的加权kappa统计,对两个指标的十分位排名之间的一致性进行了评估。结果:将包含药费的总费用成本效率指标与不包含药费的总费用成本效率指标进行比较,两者的一致性仅为55%。在总费用药房规模较大的专科,两项指标的一致性相对较低,且总费用与计入或不计入药费的相关性低于各专科的平均水平。结论:这些结果表明,药房费用的遗漏可能会导致相互矛盾的结果,可能会使医疗机构感到困惑,并可能损害提供者档案系统的可靠性。规范分析标准对提高供应商分析系统的可靠性具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信