Development of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients: A Case Series

K. Ghosh, G. Ibarra, M. R. V. Espiritu, A. Poor, N. Trenard
{"title":"Development of Pulmonary Fibrosis in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients: A Case Series","authors":"K. Ghosh, G. Ibarra, M. R. V. Espiritu, A. Poor, N. Trenard","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19, was first identified in December 2019 and declared a pandemic by the WHO in March 2020. Knowledge about COVID-19 is growing exponentially, but long-term pulmonary outcomes and factors influencing the development of fibrosis, such as intubation status, remain uncertain. We present three patients with no previous underlying pulmonary disease who developed post-ARDS fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 and continue to be severely impaired six months after initial hospitalization. Case Series: Three patients developed post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 within one month of acute infection. Two males and one female, aged 56 to 75, were admitted 4 to 7 days after symptom onset and required ICU admission. One patient required 12 days of mechanical ventilation and was managed with noninvasive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for 15 days and one was managed with HFNC for 37 days. One patient receiving oxygenation via HFNC and oxymask developed pneumomediastinum on day 30 of admission and was managed conservatively. All patients demonstrated characteristic bilateral ground-glass opacities on CT chest and follow up scans showed traction-bronchiectasis with diffuse fibrotic changes. C-reactive protein level on admission ranged from 41.22 to 30.79, and all patients received systemic corticosteroids along with therapeutic anticoagulation. All patients met criteria for home oxygen on discharge. Discussion: Post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis in COVID-19 appears to be multifactorial. Possible outcome predictors identified include: advanced age, illness severity, length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, smoking, and chronic alcoholism. While the mechanism remains uncertain, virus-induced cell injury and inflammatory mediators may be responsible for the accelerated lung damage observed. Management has evolved over the course of the pandemic from emphasis on early intubation to maximal use of non-invasive pressure ventilation, taking into consideration the potential harm associated with patient self-inflicted lung injury versus ventilator induced injury. Our case series demonstrates three patients with varying comorbidities and elevated inflammatory markers, who received steroids and therapeutic anticoagulation. All patients had similar clinical outcomes irrespective of intubation status. Conclusion: Intubation status did not appear to have an impact on progression to post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis in our case series of three patients. All patients developed fibrosis and continued to experience severe dyspnea requiring home oxygen six months after acute infection. Long-term observational cohort studies are required to better establish if mechanical ventilation is a predictor of post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis from COVID-19.","PeriodicalId":181364,"journal":{"name":"TP47. TP047 COVID AND ARDS CASE REPORTS","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP47. TP047 COVID AND ARDS CASE REPORTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19, was first identified in December 2019 and declared a pandemic by the WHO in March 2020. Knowledge about COVID-19 is growing exponentially, but long-term pulmonary outcomes and factors influencing the development of fibrosis, such as intubation status, remain uncertain. We present three patients with no previous underlying pulmonary disease who developed post-ARDS fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 and continue to be severely impaired six months after initial hospitalization. Case Series: Three patients developed post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 within one month of acute infection. Two males and one female, aged 56 to 75, were admitted 4 to 7 days after symptom onset and required ICU admission. One patient required 12 days of mechanical ventilation and was managed with noninvasive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for 15 days and one was managed with HFNC for 37 days. One patient receiving oxygenation via HFNC and oxymask developed pneumomediastinum on day 30 of admission and was managed conservatively. All patients demonstrated characteristic bilateral ground-glass opacities on CT chest and follow up scans showed traction-bronchiectasis with diffuse fibrotic changes. C-reactive protein level on admission ranged from 41.22 to 30.79, and all patients received systemic corticosteroids along with therapeutic anticoagulation. All patients met criteria for home oxygen on discharge. Discussion: Post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis in COVID-19 appears to be multifactorial. Possible outcome predictors identified include: advanced age, illness severity, length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, smoking, and chronic alcoholism. While the mechanism remains uncertain, virus-induced cell injury and inflammatory mediators may be responsible for the accelerated lung damage observed. Management has evolved over the course of the pandemic from emphasis on early intubation to maximal use of non-invasive pressure ventilation, taking into consideration the potential harm associated with patient self-inflicted lung injury versus ventilator induced injury. Our case series demonstrates three patients with varying comorbidities and elevated inflammatory markers, who received steroids and therapeutic anticoagulation. All patients had similar clinical outcomes irrespective of intubation status. Conclusion: Intubation status did not appear to have an impact on progression to post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis in our case series of three patients. All patients developed fibrosis and continued to experience severe dyspnea requiring home oxygen six months after acute infection. Long-term observational cohort studies are required to better establish if mechanical ventilation is a predictor of post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis from COVID-19.
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者肺纤维化的发展:一个病例系列
导语:2019年12月首次发现了导致COVID-19的SARS-CoV-2,并于2020年3月被世卫组织宣布为大流行。关于COVID-19的知识呈指数级增长,但长期肺结局和影响纤维化发展的因素(如插管状态)仍然不确定。我们报告了3例既往无潜在肺部疾病的患者,他们发生了继发于COVID-19的ards后纤维化,并在初次住院6个月后继续严重受损。病例系列:3例患者在1个月内急性感染COVID-19并发ards后肺纤维化。2男1女,年龄56 ~ 75岁,在症状出现后4 ~ 7天入院,需住院ICU。1例患者需机械通气12天,采用无创压力通气(NIPPV)治疗15天,1例采用HFNC治疗37天。1例患者在入院第30天通过HFNC和氧气面罩进行氧合,发生纵隔气肿,并予以保守处理。所有患者均表现出特征性的双侧胸部磨玻璃影,随访扫描显示支气管扩张伴弥漫性纤维化改变。入院时c反应蛋白水平在41.22 ~ 30.79之间,所有患者均接受全身皮质类固醇治疗和抗凝治疗。所有患者出院时均符合家庭吸氧标准。讨论:COVID-19的ards后肺纤维化似乎是多因素的。确定的可能的预后预测因素包括:高龄、疾病严重程度、ICU住院时间、机械通气、吸烟和慢性酒精中毒。虽然机制尚不确定,但病毒诱导的细胞损伤和炎症介质可能是观察到的肺损伤加速的原因。在大流行期间,管理已经从强调早期插管发展到最大限度地使用无创压力通气,同时考虑到患者自己造成的肺损伤与呼吸机引起的损伤相关的潜在危害。我们的病例系列显示了三名患有不同合并症和炎症标志物升高的患者,他们接受了类固醇和治疗性抗凝治疗。无论插管状态如何,所有患者的临床结果相似。结论:在我们的三个病例系列中,插管状态似乎对ards后肺纤维化的进展没有影响。所有患者在急性感染6个月后均出现纤维化并持续出现严重呼吸困难,需要在家吸氧。需要进行长期观察队列研究,以更好地确定机械通气是否是COVID-19所致ards后肺纤维化的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信