P155 Delivering physiotherapy outpatient assessment and treatment in a severe asthma clinic in the era of COVID-19

C. Mason, T. Brown, R. Harvey, B. Reeves, S. Folini, M. Tolson, L. Fox, L. Wiffen, A. Chauhan, R. De Vos
{"title":"P155 Delivering physiotherapy outpatient assessment and treatment in a severe asthma clinic in the era of COVID-19","authors":"C. Mason, T. Brown, R. Harvey, B. Reeves, S. Folini, M. Tolson, L. Fox, L. Wiffen, A. Chauhan, R. De Vos","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and ObjectivesThe global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has forced clinicians to consider alternative methods of service provision to patients with respiratory conditions who were clinically vulnerable and/or advised to shield.Breathing pattern disorders (BPD) are a common comorbidity affecting approximately one third of patients with asthma. The respiratory physiotherapy team within the Portsmouth Severe Asthma Service (PSAS) recognised the need to continue to assess and deliver treatment for patients with BPD particularly at a time of heightened anxiety.Breathing retraining requires precise and highly specific assessment and treatment to ensure optimal outcomes and the decision to use a video conferencing platform was made to utilise the visual medium. To ensure quality service was being delivered, patients using the video conferencing platform to receive respiratory physiotherapy in the PSAS were asked for feedback.MethodsAt the end of every video consultation, written feedback was requested. Sixty-nine responses were received from July 2020-May 2021. Patients were asked to rate their physiotherapy consultation from very good to very poor;how they would prefer to receive treatment;if they would use this method of consultation again and the ease of use of the video consultation.ResultsOf the 69 responses:68/69 (98%) would use the service again58/69 (84%) rated the service as very good35/69 (51%) would choose video over face to face appointments23/69 (33%) would prefer to be seen face to face63/69 (91%) felt that accessibility of the video platform could be improvedQualitative feedback was also gathered from patients and included statements suchExcellent quality and a very thorough appointment.It was helpful to actually see a clinician face to face via video instead of a phone callConclusionsVideo consultations have proven to be a feasible and successful way of assessing BPD in asthma patients. Despite feedback regarding the ease of accessing the online platform being suboptimal, overarching positive responses to video consultations was received. With 51% favouring being seen via video consultation rather than face to face, this has wider implications for patients and the NHS including reduced travel time to appointments and reduced waiting room pressures.","PeriodicalId":285482,"journal":{"name":"New treatment pathways in the post-COVID-19 era","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New treatment pathways in the post-COVID-19 era","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and ObjectivesThe global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has forced clinicians to consider alternative methods of service provision to patients with respiratory conditions who were clinically vulnerable and/or advised to shield.Breathing pattern disorders (BPD) are a common comorbidity affecting approximately one third of patients with asthma. The respiratory physiotherapy team within the Portsmouth Severe Asthma Service (PSAS) recognised the need to continue to assess and deliver treatment for patients with BPD particularly at a time of heightened anxiety.Breathing retraining requires precise and highly specific assessment and treatment to ensure optimal outcomes and the decision to use a video conferencing platform was made to utilise the visual medium. To ensure quality service was being delivered, patients using the video conferencing platform to receive respiratory physiotherapy in the PSAS were asked for feedback.MethodsAt the end of every video consultation, written feedback was requested. Sixty-nine responses were received from July 2020-May 2021. Patients were asked to rate their physiotherapy consultation from very good to very poor;how they would prefer to receive treatment;if they would use this method of consultation again and the ease of use of the video consultation.ResultsOf the 69 responses:68/69 (98%) would use the service again58/69 (84%) rated the service as very good35/69 (51%) would choose video over face to face appointments23/69 (33%) would prefer to be seen face to face63/69 (91%) felt that accessibility of the video platform could be improvedQualitative feedback was also gathered from patients and included statements suchExcellent quality and a very thorough appointment.It was helpful to actually see a clinician face to face via video instead of a phone callConclusionsVideo consultations have proven to be a feasible and successful way of assessing BPD in asthma patients. Despite feedback regarding the ease of accessing the online platform being suboptimal, overarching positive responses to video consultations was received. With 51% favouring being seen via video consultation rather than face to face, this has wider implications for patients and the NHS including reduced travel time to appointments and reduced waiting room pressures.
P155新冠肺炎时代重症哮喘门诊开展物理治疗门诊评估与治疗
全球SARS-CoV-2大流行迫使临床医生考虑为临床易感和/或建议采取防护措施的呼吸系统疾病患者提供其他服务方法。呼吸模式障碍(BPD)是一种常见的合并症,影响了大约三分之一的哮喘患者。朴茨茅斯严重哮喘服务中心(PSAS)的呼吸物理治疗小组认识到有必要继续对BPD患者进行评估和提供治疗,特别是在焦虑加剧的时候。呼吸再训练需要精确和高度具体的评估和治疗,以确保最佳结果,并决定使用视频会议平台来利用视觉媒体。为了确保提供高质量的服务,使用视频会议平台在PSAS接受呼吸物理治疗的患者被要求反馈。方法每次视频咨询结束后,征求书面反馈意见。从2020年7月至2021年5月,共收到69份答复。患者被要求对他们的物理治疗咨询进行评分,从非常好到非常差;他们希望如何接受治疗;他们是否会再次使用这种咨询方法以及视频咨询的易用性。结果在69个回复中:68/69(98%)会再次使用该服务58/69(84%)认为服务非常好35/69(51%)会选择视频而不是面对面的预约23/69(33%)更喜欢面对面的会面63/69(91%)认为视频平台的可访问性可以得到改善也从患者那里收集了定性反馈,包括“优秀的质量和非常彻底的预约”。通过视频而不是电话与临床医生面对面交流是有帮助的。结论视频会诊已被证明是评估哮喘患者BPD的一种可行和成功的方法。尽管关于访问在线平台的便利性的反馈并不理想,但收到了对视频咨询的总体积极回应。51%的人赞成通过视频咨询而不是面对面,这对患者和NHS有更广泛的影响,包括减少预约的旅行时间和减少候诊室的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书