Perbandingan Metode Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) dan Forest Canopy Density (FCD) untuk Identifikasi Tutupan Vegetasi (Kasus; Area Pembuatan Jalan Baru Singaraja-Mengwi)

A. Sediyo, A. Nugraha, I. Putu, Ananda Citra, Article Info Abstrak
{"title":"Perbandingan Metode Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) dan Forest Canopy Density (FCD) untuk Identifikasi Tutupan Vegetasi (Kasus; Area Pembuatan Jalan Baru Singaraja-Mengwi)","authors":"A. Sediyo, A. Nugraha, I. Putu, Ananda Citra, Article Info Abstrak","doi":"10.15294/JG.V18I1.25367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research uses Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS image which objective to determine the accuracy level of SAVI method and FCD model in the identification of vegetation cover. It is done as an effort to assist in determining the right method of monitoring the change of vegetation cover in the forest area. Therefore, this research compares the vegetation index of Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) because it is able to suppress the background of the soil so that the vegetation cover is able to be displayed according to the conditions in the field. While the FCD model uses four variables such as; Advanced Vegetation Index (AVI), Bare Soil Index (BI), Shadow Index (SI), and thermal index using the Split-Windows Algorithm (SWA) method. Comparison results between SAVI and FCD models indicate that the higher accuracy of SAVI is 84% and FCD model is only 82%. It is possible because the limited use of research areas that show SAVI is superior due to heterogeneous conditions and it approaches the conditions in the field than the FCD model that is more group and only able to be realized in three classes. Based on the results, it was concluded that the vegetation index can be used in monitoring the limited area of research but it is also not absolute because it is possible that FCD model is better.","PeriodicalId":204573,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Geografi : Media Informasi Pengembangan dan Profesi Kegeografian","volume":"506 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Geografi : Media Informasi Pengembangan dan Profesi Kegeografian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/JG.V18I1.25367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research uses Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS image which objective to determine the accuracy level of SAVI method and FCD model in the identification of vegetation cover. It is done as an effort to assist in determining the right method of monitoring the change of vegetation cover in the forest area. Therefore, this research compares the vegetation index of Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) because it is able to suppress the background of the soil so that the vegetation cover is able to be displayed according to the conditions in the field. While the FCD model uses four variables such as; Advanced Vegetation Index (AVI), Bare Soil Index (BI), Shadow Index (SI), and thermal index using the Split-Windows Algorithm (SWA) method. Comparison results between SAVI and FCD models indicate that the higher accuracy of SAVI is 84% and FCD model is only 82%. It is possible because the limited use of research areas that show SAVI is superior due to heterogeneous conditions and it approaches the conditions in the field than the FCD model that is more group and only able to be realized in three classes. Based on the results, it was concluded that the vegetation index can be used in monitoring the limited area of research but it is also not absolute because it is possible that FCD model is better.
本研究利用Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS图像,目的是确定SAVI方法和FCD模型在植被覆盖识别中的精度水平。这样做是为了协助确定监测森林地区植被覆盖变化的正确方法。因此,本研究比较了土壤调整植被指数(Soil Adjusted vegetation index, SAVI)的植被指数,因为SAVI能够抑制土壤的背景,使植被覆盖能够根据野外条件显示。而FCD模型使用四个变量,如;利用分窗算法(split - window Algorithm, SWA)方法获取高级植被指数(AVI)、裸土指数(BI)、阴影指数(SI)和热指数。SAVI模型与FCD模型的比较结果表明,SAVI模型的准确率高达84%,而FCD模型的准确率仅为82%。这是可能的,因为有限的研究领域的使用表明SAVI是优越的,由于异质性的条件,它比FCD模型更接近于现场的条件,FCD模型更群体,只能在三个类别中实现。结果表明,植被指数可以用于有限研究区域的监测,但也不是绝对的,因为FCD模型可能更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信