English versus Native Language for Higher Education in Computer Science: A Pilot Study

Taj Muhammad Khan, Syedali Nabi
{"title":"English versus Native Language for Higher Education in Computer Science: A Pilot Study","authors":"Taj Muhammad Khan, Syedali Nabi","doi":"10.1145/3488042.3488070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the official language of instruction for higher education programs in Pakistan is English, in practice it can vary from English-only, to some combination of English and a native language, to native language only. There is a lack of consistency not just across institutions, but also across classrooms in the same institution. We have conducted a pilot study based on a small cohort of computer science students, who happened to have some of the lectures of the same course delivered in Urdu, and the others in English. Based on a questionnaire response with both quantitative and free text questions, we investigated students’ self reported oral and written communication skills, as well as their preference of language for lectures. We found, albeit based on a limited, pilot study, that using Urdu, the first language of most of our students, as the medium of oral communication (lectures, general classroom communication) should be preferred, whereas English should remain the language of choice for written communication. We expect to expand this study to multiple classrooms across institutions in Pakistan and other countries operating in a similar context, so that more definitive conclusions can be derived, potentially leading to better informed, evidence-based policies and practices in the future.","PeriodicalId":218947,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3488042.3488070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

While the official language of instruction for higher education programs in Pakistan is English, in practice it can vary from English-only, to some combination of English and a native language, to native language only. There is a lack of consistency not just across institutions, but also across classrooms in the same institution. We have conducted a pilot study based on a small cohort of computer science students, who happened to have some of the lectures of the same course delivered in Urdu, and the others in English. Based on a questionnaire response with both quantitative and free text questions, we investigated students’ self reported oral and written communication skills, as well as their preference of language for lectures. We found, albeit based on a limited, pilot study, that using Urdu, the first language of most of our students, as the medium of oral communication (lectures, general classroom communication) should be preferred, whereas English should remain the language of choice for written communication. We expect to expand this study to multiple classrooms across institutions in Pakistan and other countries operating in a similar context, so that more definitive conclusions can be derived, potentially leading to better informed, evidence-based policies and practices in the future.
计算机科学高等教育中的英语与母语:一项试点研究
虽然巴基斯坦高等教育课程的官方教学语言是英语,但在实践中,它可以从纯英语到英语和母语的某种组合,再到纯母语。不仅各个机构之间缺乏一致性,同一机构的各个教室之间也缺乏一致性。我们对一小群计算机科学专业的学生进行了一项试点研究,这些学生碰巧在同一门课上的一些讲座是用乌尔都语讲授的,而另一些则是用英语讲授的。基于定量和自由文本问题的问卷调查,我们调查了学生自我报告的口头和书面沟通能力,以及他们对讲课语言的偏好。我们发现,尽管基于有限的试点研究,使用乌尔都语(我们大多数学生的第一语言)作为口头交流(讲座,一般课堂交流)的媒介应该是首选的,而英语应该仍然是书面交流的首选语言。我们希望将这项研究扩展到巴基斯坦和其他国家在类似背景下运作的机构的多个教室,以便得出更明确的结论,从而有可能在未来制定更明智、更循证的政策和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书