GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT IN GHANA AN ASSESSMENT OF THE VOLUNTARY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT

Gordon Kofi Sarfo-adu, Gladys Nkrumah
{"title":"GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT IN GHANA AN ASSESSMENT OF THE VOLUNTARY PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT","authors":"Gordon Kofi Sarfo-adu, Gladys Nkrumah","doi":"10.35410/ijaeb.2021.5655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study to assess the role of governance systems in sustainable forest practices in Ghana using the experience of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement. It was underpinned by four main objectives: rationale for Ghana’s ratification and obligations inherent in the Voluntary Partnership Agreement VPA; the institutional structures for implementing the VPA in Ghana; VPA enforcement and forest sector trade; and constraints in the VPA enforcement process. The policy arrangement approach and complexity of joint actions provided the theoretical framework for the study. The qualitative approach within the interpretivist research paradigm was employed for the study. Essentially, the VPA was ratified as a way of speeding up good governance process in the forestry sector of Ghana, promoting sustainable management of forest resources, enhancing and sustain the trade relationship with the EU. Meeting the requirements of the VPA has led to the institutionalization of relevant structures and mechanisms within and beyond the Forestry Commission including the use of technology-enhanced tracking and independent monitor for counter verifications which helps in detection of illegal wood harvesting. The VPA together with the established enforcement structures has had far reaching positive implications on the forest sector which are discussed in the study. The study, however, observed some challenges which affect the full realization of the expected benefits associated with the VPA. The study concludes that a policy even if originates from external source is more likely to be embraced if it does not challenge but feeds into government’s prevalent activities, the legitimacy of that agreement/policy and enforcement remains higher. Secondly, the VPA is an external mechanism which has been localized and infused with ongoing projects to provide novel and innovative mechanisms for supporting Ghana’s desires and quest to manage forests better, improve peoples’ livelihoods, and protect natural resources. The study makes recommendations which includes the use of stakeholder consultations and workshops to help to address inter-agency coordination problem which will help optimize the enforcement of the VPA.","PeriodicalId":364314,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Bioresearch","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Bioresearch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35410/ijaeb.2021.5655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study to assess the role of governance systems in sustainable forest practices in Ghana using the experience of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement. It was underpinned by four main objectives: rationale for Ghana’s ratification and obligations inherent in the Voluntary Partnership Agreement VPA; the institutional structures for implementing the VPA in Ghana; VPA enforcement and forest sector trade; and constraints in the VPA enforcement process. The policy arrangement approach and complexity of joint actions provided the theoretical framework for the study. The qualitative approach within the interpretivist research paradigm was employed for the study. Essentially, the VPA was ratified as a way of speeding up good governance process in the forestry sector of Ghana, promoting sustainable management of forest resources, enhancing and sustain the trade relationship with the EU. Meeting the requirements of the VPA has led to the institutionalization of relevant structures and mechanisms within and beyond the Forestry Commission including the use of technology-enhanced tracking and independent monitor for counter verifications which helps in detection of illegal wood harvesting. The VPA together with the established enforcement structures has had far reaching positive implications on the forest sector which are discussed in the study. The study, however, observed some challenges which affect the full realization of the expected benefits associated with the VPA. The study concludes that a policy even if originates from external source is more likely to be embraced if it does not challenge but feeds into government’s prevalent activities, the legitimacy of that agreement/policy and enforcement remains higher. Secondly, the VPA is an external mechanism which has been localized and infused with ongoing projects to provide novel and innovative mechanisms for supporting Ghana’s desires and quest to manage forests better, improve peoples’ livelihoods, and protect natural resources. The study makes recommendations which includes the use of stakeholder consultations and workshops to help to address inter-agency coordination problem which will help optimize the enforcement of the VPA.
加纳的治理和可持续森林管理:对自愿伙伴关系协定的评估
本研究旨在利用《自愿伙伴关系协定》的经验,评估治理系统在加纳可持续森林实践中的作用。它以四个主要目标为基础:加纳批准《自愿伙伴关系协定》的理由和内在义务;在加纳执行《自愿行动方案》的体制结构;《森林保护法》的执行和森林部门贸易;以及VPA执行过程中的制约因素。政策安排方法和联合行动的复杂性为研究提供了理论框架。本研究采用解释主义研究范式中的定性方法。从本质上讲,批准该协定是为了加快加纳林业部门的良好治理进程,促进森林资源的可持续管理,加强和维持与欧盟的贸易关系。满足《森林行动纲领》的要求已使林业委员会内外的有关结构和机制制度化,包括使用技术加强的跟踪和独立监测进行反核查,这有助于发现非法采伐木材。VPA连同已建立的执法结构对森林部门产生了深远的积极影响,研究报告对此进行了讨论。然而,这项研究发现了一些挑战,这些挑战影响了与VPA相关的预期利益的充分实现。该研究的结论是,如果一项政策不挑战政府的普遍活动,而是融入政府的普遍活动,那么它即使来自外部来源,也更有可能被接受,该协议/政策和执行的合法性仍然更高。其次,VPA是一个外部机制,已经本地化并融入正在进行的项目,为支持加纳更好地管理森林、改善人民生计和保护自然资源的愿望和追求提供新颖和创新的机制。该研究提出了建议,其中包括利用利益攸关方协商和讲习班来帮助解决机构间协调问题,这将有助于优化《自愿行动法》的执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信