Verification of Causality through VAR and Intervention Analysis: Econometric Modeling on Budget Deficit and Trade Deficit in Nepal

S. Acharya
{"title":"Verification of Causality through VAR and Intervention Analysis: Econometric Modeling on Budget Deficit and Trade Deficit in Nepal","authors":"S. Acharya","doi":"10.3126/nrber.v21i1.52802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direction of causality between budget deficit and trade deficit, which is popularly known as Twin Deficit Hypothesis (TDH), has been tested in this paper covering the period 1964-2004. Stationarity, co-integration, and error correction tests have been performed as fundamental groundwork on real-term datasets. Datasets are found to be stationary at first difference. Long-run relationship (cointegration) among model variables is found at first difference. Long-run stability has been supported since short-run dynamics indicated converging pattern. Residual tests and conventional Granger Causality tests suggested trade deficit has been Granger Caused by the budget deficit. This initial gesticulation has further been reinforced by the vector autoregressive (VAR) modeling and intervention analysis (impulse response function and variance decomposition) also as it has reconfirmed unidirectional causality from budget deficit to trade deficit indicating need of a policy revisit regarding efficient public expenditure management, export-led growth and strategic capital formation with the help of revised fiscal, monetary and financial policies in the present globalization context.","PeriodicalId":372963,"journal":{"name":"NRB Economic Review","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NRB Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/nrber.v21i1.52802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Direction of causality between budget deficit and trade deficit, which is popularly known as Twin Deficit Hypothesis (TDH), has been tested in this paper covering the period 1964-2004. Stationarity, co-integration, and error correction tests have been performed as fundamental groundwork on real-term datasets. Datasets are found to be stationary at first difference. Long-run relationship (cointegration) among model variables is found at first difference. Long-run stability has been supported since short-run dynamics indicated converging pattern. Residual tests and conventional Granger Causality tests suggested trade deficit has been Granger Caused by the budget deficit. This initial gesticulation has further been reinforced by the vector autoregressive (VAR) modeling and intervention analysis (impulse response function and variance decomposition) also as it has reconfirmed unidirectional causality from budget deficit to trade deficit indicating need of a policy revisit regarding efficient public expenditure management, export-led growth and strategic capital formation with the help of revised fiscal, monetary and financial policies in the present globalization context.
VAR因果关系验证与干预分析:尼泊尔预算赤字与贸易赤字的计量经济模型
本文对1964-2004年期间的预算赤字与贸易赤字之间的因果关系方向进行了检验,即通常所说的双赤字假设(TDH)。平稳性、协整性和纠错测试作为对实际数据集的基本基础进行了研究。发现数据集在第一次差异时是平稳的。模型变量之间的长期关系(协整)是在第一次差分中发现的。由于短期动态表明趋同模式,长期稳定性得到了支持。残差检验和传统格兰杰因果检验表明,贸易逆差是由预算赤字格兰杰造成的。向量自回归(VAR)模型和干预分析(脉冲响应函数和方差分解)进一步加强了这一初步姿态,因为它再次确认了从预算赤字到贸易赤字的单向因果关系,表明需要在修订的财政政策的帮助下,重新审视有关有效的公共支出管理、出口导向型增长和战略资本形成的政策。当前全球化背景下的货币和金融政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信