Parameterized algorithms for Eccentricity Shortest Path Problem

Sriram Bhyravarapu, Satyabrata Jana, Lawqueen Kanesh, Saket Saurabh, Shaily Verma
{"title":"Parameterized algorithms for Eccentricity Shortest Path Problem","authors":"Sriram Bhyravarapu, Satyabrata Jana, Lawqueen Kanesh, Saket Saurabh, Shaily Verma","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2304.03233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and an integer $\\ell$, the Eccentricity Shortest Path (ESP) asks to find a shortest path $P$ such that for every vertex $v\\in V(G)$, there is a vertex $w\\in P$ such that $d_G(v,w)\\leq \\ell$, where $d_G(v,w)$ represents the distance between $v$ and $w$ in $G$. Dragan and Leitert [Theor. Comput. Sci. 2017] showed that the optimization version of this problem, which asks to find the minimum $\\ell$ for the ESP problem, is NP-hard even on planar bipartite graphs with maximum degree 3. They also showed that ESP is W[2]-hard when parameterized by $\\ell$. On the positive side, Ku\\v cera and Such\\'y [IWOCA 2021] showed that the problem exhibits fixed parameter tractable (FPT) behavior when parameterized by modular width, cluster vertex deletion set, maximum leaf number, or the combined parameters disjoint paths deletion set and $\\ell$. It was asked as an open question in the above paper, if ESP is FPT parameterized by disjoint paths deletion set or feedback vertex set. We answer these questions partially and obtain the following results: - ESP is FPT when parameterized by disjoint paths deletion set, split vertex deletion set or the combined parameters feedback vertex set and eccentricity of the graph. - We design a $(1+\\epsilon)$-factor FPT approximation algorithm when parameterized by the feedback vertex set number. - ESP is W[2]-hard when parameterized by the chordal vertex deletion set.","PeriodicalId":403593,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Combinatorial Algorithms","volume":"517 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Combinatorial Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.03233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given an undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ and an integer $\ell$, the Eccentricity Shortest Path (ESP) asks to find a shortest path $P$ such that for every vertex $v\in V(G)$, there is a vertex $w\in P$ such that $d_G(v,w)\leq \ell$, where $d_G(v,w)$ represents the distance between $v$ and $w$ in $G$. Dragan and Leitert [Theor. Comput. Sci. 2017] showed that the optimization version of this problem, which asks to find the minimum $\ell$ for the ESP problem, is NP-hard even on planar bipartite graphs with maximum degree 3. They also showed that ESP is W[2]-hard when parameterized by $\ell$. On the positive side, Ku\v cera and Such\'y [IWOCA 2021] showed that the problem exhibits fixed parameter tractable (FPT) behavior when parameterized by modular width, cluster vertex deletion set, maximum leaf number, or the combined parameters disjoint paths deletion set and $\ell$. It was asked as an open question in the above paper, if ESP is FPT parameterized by disjoint paths deletion set or feedback vertex set. We answer these questions partially and obtain the following results: - ESP is FPT when parameterized by disjoint paths deletion set, split vertex deletion set or the combined parameters feedback vertex set and eccentricity of the graph. - We design a $(1+\epsilon)$-factor FPT approximation algorithm when parameterized by the feedback vertex set number. - ESP is W[2]-hard when parameterized by the chordal vertex deletion set.
偏心最短路径问题的参数化算法
给定一个无向图$G=(V,E)$和一个整数$\ell$,偏心最短路径(ESP)要求找到一个最短路径$P$,使得对于每个顶点$v\in V(G)$,都有一个顶点$w\in P$,使得$d_G(v,w)\leq \ell$,其中$d_G(v,w)$表示$G$中$v$和$w$之间的距离。德拉甘和莱特[理论]。计算。Sci. 2017]表明,该问题的优化版本要求找到ESP问题的最小值$\ell$,即使在最大度为3的平面二部图上也是np困难的。他们还表明,当用$\ell$参数化ESP时,ESP是W[2]-hard。从积极的方面来看,Ku \v cera和Suchý [IWOCA 2021]表明,当采用模块化宽度、聚类顶点删除集、最大叶数或组合参数不相交路径删除集和$\ell$进行参数化时,问题表现出固定参数可处理(FPT)行为。ESP是用不相交路径删除集还是反馈顶点集来参数化FPT,这是本文提出的一个开放性问题。我们部分地回答了这些问题,得到了以下结果:当用不相交路径删除集、分割顶点删除集或组合参数反馈顶点集和图的偏心率参数化ESP时,ESP是FPT。-我们设计了一个$(1+\epsilon)$ -因子FPT近似算法当参数化的反馈顶点集数。- ESP是W[2]-hard参数化时,弦顶点删除集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信