Can an unconventional Socio-technical System approach open the way to new solutions and new understanding?

T. Haga
{"title":"Can an unconventional Socio-technical System approach open the way to new solutions and new understanding?","authors":"T. Haga","doi":"10.46364/EJWI.V4I2.567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Socio-technical System Design (STSD) was developed as an alternative to the prevailing Taylorist organisational design principles focusing on specialisation and standardisation. STSD emphasised quality of work and has thus been described as a strategy for “simple organisation and complex jobs”. This may sound like a partial strategy for developing holistic, meaningful jobs. However, it is as much about developing efficient organisations with interactions between people and technology that increase company competitiveness.STSD has taken different directions in different countries/geographic areas. All these directions emphasise holistic job design and employee participation. However, approaches to achieving holistic job design and to the role of employee participation vary. The ongoing digital revolution, often labelled Industry 4.0, is rapidly changing the conditions for work in general. Tasks that were previously manual are being automated, and communications and information are being made available to an extent not seen until now. In this landscape, it is necessary to consider whether we have suitable approaches for facing the challenges posed by these technological developments.In this paper, which considers two strands in the tradition of STSD theory and a case study, I will examine the need to introduce a familiar but rarely discussed or used STSD approach to major technological and organisational changes","PeriodicalId":115904,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Workplace Innovation","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Workplace Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46364/EJWI.V4I2.567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Socio-technical System Design (STSD) was developed as an alternative to the prevailing Taylorist organisational design principles focusing on specialisation and standardisation. STSD emphasised quality of work and has thus been described as a strategy for “simple organisation and complex jobs”. This may sound like a partial strategy for developing holistic, meaningful jobs. However, it is as much about developing efficient organisations with interactions between people and technology that increase company competitiveness.STSD has taken different directions in different countries/geographic areas. All these directions emphasise holistic job design and employee participation. However, approaches to achieving holistic job design and to the role of employee participation vary. The ongoing digital revolution, often labelled Industry 4.0, is rapidly changing the conditions for work in general. Tasks that were previously manual are being automated, and communications and information are being made available to an extent not seen until now. In this landscape, it is necessary to consider whether we have suitable approaches for facing the challenges posed by these technological developments.In this paper, which considers two strands in the tradition of STSD theory and a case study, I will examine the need to introduce a familiar but rarely discussed or used STSD approach to major technological and organisational changes
非传统的社会技术系统方法能否为新的解决方案和新的理解开辟道路?
社会技术系统设计(STSD)是作为一种替代主流的泰勒组织设计原则而发展起来的,该原则侧重于专业化和标准化。STSD强调工作质量,因此被描述为“简单组织和复杂工作”的策略。这听起来像是发展整体的、有意义的工作的部分策略。然而,发展高效的组织也同样重要,人与技术之间的互动可以提高公司的竞争力。在不同的国家/地区,std采取了不同的发展方向。所有这些方向都强调整体工作设计和员工参与。然而,实现整体工作设计的方法和员工参与的作用各不相同。正在进行的数字革命,通常被称为工业4.0,正在迅速改变一般的工作条件。以前手工完成的任务正在自动化,通信和信息的可用性也达到了前所未有的程度。在这种情况下,有必要考虑我们是否有合适的方法来面对这些技术发展带来的挑战。在本文中,我将考虑两股传统的科技可持续发展理论和一个案例研究,我将研究是否需要引入一个熟悉的,但很少讨论或使用的科技可持续发展方法来进行重大的技术和组织变革
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信