Donna Orange: Sistemas intersubjetivos, Filosofía y Ética

Carlos Rodríguez Sutil
{"title":"Donna Orange: Sistemas intersubjetivos, Filosofía y Ética","authors":"Carlos Rodríguez Sutil","doi":"10.21110/19882939.2022.160202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we examine Donna Orange's contribution to ethics within the psychoanalytic clinic, from the perspective of the theory of intersubjective systems and the critique of the Cartesian isolated mind. Above all, she says we must place a radically asymmetrical relationship, of infinite responsibility to the other person. The ethical approach proposed by Orange derives from the ideas of Emmanuel Levinas, regarding the curvature of the intersubjective space and the total asymmetry before the face of the other, which we cannot take as an object of knowledge, and, later, that of the Danish philosopher, Knud Ejler Løgstrup, also a huge defender of that asymmetry: a person is a debtor because he or she exists and has received his life as a gift. We criticize this absolutism of moral obligation that is based on “debt”, concept very close to “guilt”, and not from “joy”. We criticize this proposed absolutism of the moral obligation that is based on \"debt\", close to \"fault\", and not from joy, and which poses what we consider a moral egocentrism. Ultimately, who is the subject of the moral mandate?","PeriodicalId":318287,"journal":{"name":"Clínica e Investigación Relacional","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clínica e Investigación Relacional","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21110/19882939.2022.160202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we examine Donna Orange's contribution to ethics within the psychoanalytic clinic, from the perspective of the theory of intersubjective systems and the critique of the Cartesian isolated mind. Above all, she says we must place a radically asymmetrical relationship, of infinite responsibility to the other person. The ethical approach proposed by Orange derives from the ideas of Emmanuel Levinas, regarding the curvature of the intersubjective space and the total asymmetry before the face of the other, which we cannot take as an object of knowledge, and, later, that of the Danish philosopher, Knud Ejler Løgstrup, also a huge defender of that asymmetry: a person is a debtor because he or she exists and has received his life as a gift. We criticize this absolutism of moral obligation that is based on “debt”, concept very close to “guilt”, and not from “joy”. We criticize this proposed absolutism of the moral obligation that is based on "debt", close to "fault", and not from joy, and which poses what we consider a moral egocentrism. Ultimately, who is the subject of the moral mandate?
唐娜·奥兰治:主体间系统、哲学与伦理学
在本文中,我们从主体间系统理论和对笛卡尔孤立思想的批判的角度来审视唐娜·奥兰治对精神分析临床伦理学的贡献。最重要的是,她说,我们必须建立一种完全不对称的关系,对另一个人承担无限的责任。Orange提出的伦理方法来源于伊马纽埃尔·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)关于主体间空间的曲率和我们不能作为知识对象的他者面前的完全不对称的观点,以及后来丹麦哲学家努德·埃杰勒·洛格斯特鲁普(Knud Ejler Løgstrup)的观点,他也是这种不对称的巨大捍者:一个人是债务人,因为他或她存在,并接受了他的生命作为礼物。我们批判这种道德义务的绝对主义,它建立在“债务”这个非常接近“罪”的概念上,而不是建立在“快乐”的基础上。我们批评这种道德义务的绝对主义,这种绝对主义是基于“债务”,接近“过错”,而不是来自快乐,它构成了我们所认为的道德自我中心主义。最终,谁是道德命令的主体?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信