Analisa Perbandingan Rumus Haversine Dan Rumus Euclidean Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis Menggunakan Metode Independent Sample t-Test

Retno Palupi, Diyan Ayuk Yulianna, S. S. Winarsih
{"title":"Analisa Perbandingan Rumus Haversine Dan Rumus Euclidean Berbasis Sistem Informasi Geografis Menggunakan Metode Independent Sample t-Test","authors":"Retno Palupi, Diyan Ayuk Yulianna, S. S. Winarsih","doi":"10.36596/jitu.v5i1.494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comparative Analysis of the Haversine Formula and the Euclidean Formula based on Geographical Information Systems which aims to analyze and compare the measurement results of the two formulas whether there are significant differences to the distance measured based on geographic information systems. Research objects used to collect distance data are several bank offices in the city of Solo. The method used in this research is to create a geographic information system application using web-based programming using the PHP (Pearl Hypertext Prepocessor) programming language, with the MySQL database. Measurements were carried out on two formulas, namely the Haversine formula and the Euclidean formula and obtained data in the form of distances in kilometers (km) which were obtained from the program system, then the data was processed using Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) 23 software. is the Independent Sample t-test method. From the data analysis, the conclusion is that there is no significant difference in the calculation of the distance between the Haversine formula and the Euclidean formula. The Independent Sample T Test method is able to analyze the comparison of distance measurements using the Haversine formula and the Euclidean formula does not have a significant difference, meaning that the variants of the two formulas are the same. \n  \nKata Kunci : Haversine   formula,    Euclidean  formula ,   geographic   \n                       information system, Independent Sample  t-Test Method","PeriodicalId":185704,"journal":{"name":"JITU : Journal Informatic Technology And Communication","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JITU : Journal Informatic Technology And Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36596/jitu.v5i1.494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Comparative Analysis of the Haversine Formula and the Euclidean Formula based on Geographical Information Systems which aims to analyze and compare the measurement results of the two formulas whether there are significant differences to the distance measured based on geographic information systems. Research objects used to collect distance data are several bank offices in the city of Solo. The method used in this research is to create a geographic information system application using web-based programming using the PHP (Pearl Hypertext Prepocessor) programming language, with the MySQL database. Measurements were carried out on two formulas, namely the Haversine formula and the Euclidean formula and obtained data in the form of distances in kilometers (km) which were obtained from the program system, then the data was processed using Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) 23 software. is the Independent Sample t-test method. From the data analysis, the conclusion is that there is no significant difference in the calculation of the distance between the Haversine formula and the Euclidean formula. The Independent Sample T Test method is able to analyze the comparison of distance measurements using the Haversine formula and the Euclidean formula does not have a significant difference, meaning that the variants of the two formulas are the same.   Kata Kunci : Haversine   formula,    Euclidean  formula ,   geographic                          information system, Independent Sample  t-Test Method
利用独立样本测试方法对哈佛辛的地理信息系统和欧几里得的地理公式进行比较
基于地理信息系统的哈弗斯公式与欧几里得公式的比较分析,旨在分析比较两种公式的测量结果在基于地理信息系统的测量距离上是否存在显著差异。用于收集距离数据的研究对象是索罗市的几家银行办公室。本研究采用的方法是使用PHP (Pearl Hypertext preprocessor)编程语言,使用MySQL数据库,采用基于web的编程方式创建一个地理信息系统应用程序。对哈弗辛公式和欧几里得公式进行测量,并从程序系统中获得以公里(km)为单位的距离,然后使用SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solution) 23软件对数据进行处理。为独立样本t检验方法。从数据分析中得出结论,哈弗斯公式与欧几里得公式在计算距离上没有显著差异。独立样本T检验方法可以分析使用哈弗辛公式和欧几里得公式的距离测量值的比较没有显著差异,即两个公式的变体是相同的。Kata Kunci:哈弗斯公式,欧几里得公式,地理信息系统,独立样本t检验方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信