Evaluation of the Quality and Comparison of Dosimetric Parameters of Plans for Craniospinal Irradiation Using VMAT Method at Varian TrueBeam and Varian Halcyon Accelerators

A. E. Gumbatova, A. Ovsyannikov, I. Lebedenko, I. I. Luzina
{"title":"Evaluation of the Quality and Comparison of Dosimetric Parameters of Plans for Craniospinal Irradiation Using VMAT Method at Varian TrueBeam and Varian Halcyon Accelerators","authors":"A. E. Gumbatova, A. Ovsyannikov, I. Lebedenko, I. I. Luzina","doi":"10.52775/1810-200x-2022-96-4-30-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To carry out a comparative analysis of the dosimetric characteristics of plans for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) performed by the VMAT technique on Varian TrueBeam and Halcyon electron accelerators. \nMaterial and methods: Comparison of dose distributions was carried out for a group of 5 patients with tumors of the central nervous system. Contouring and planning were in Eclipse version 15.6. The following dose characteristics were calculated and evaluated: homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), target coverage (CO) and constraints (lenses, esophagus, lungs, heart, liver, bowel bag and kidneys). Patient-Specific QA was performed to verify the consistency of the dose distribution calculated in the planning system and obtained at the accelerators. \nResults: For all CSI plans the target coverage metric was D98>95 % and constraints for critical organs were obtained. Homogeneity index was HI<=0.12 for two accelerators. The mean value of the CI conformity index was 1.09 for the TrueBeam accelerator, and CI=1.12 for the Halcyon. Gamma analysis showed results within tolerance both plans at TrueBeam and Halcyon. Conclusions have been made about the advantages and disadvantages of CSI on TrueBeam and Halcyon electron accelerators. \nConclusion: It is possible to treat patients with the CSI method on the Halcyon accelerator using the VMAT method with the same quality as on the TrueBeam accelerator.","PeriodicalId":222791,"journal":{"name":"Meditsinskaya Fizika","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meditsinskaya Fizika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52775/1810-200x-2022-96-4-30-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To carry out a comparative analysis of the dosimetric characteristics of plans for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) performed by the VMAT technique on Varian TrueBeam and Halcyon electron accelerators. Material and methods: Comparison of dose distributions was carried out for a group of 5 patients with tumors of the central nervous system. Contouring and planning were in Eclipse version 15.6. The following dose characteristics were calculated and evaluated: homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), target coverage (CO) and constraints (lenses, esophagus, lungs, heart, liver, bowel bag and kidneys). Patient-Specific QA was performed to verify the consistency of the dose distribution calculated in the planning system and obtained at the accelerators. Results: For all CSI plans the target coverage metric was D98>95 % and constraints for critical organs were obtained. Homogeneity index was HI<=0.12 for two accelerators. The mean value of the CI conformity index was 1.09 for the TrueBeam accelerator, and CI=1.12 for the Halcyon. Gamma analysis showed results within tolerance both plans at TrueBeam and Halcyon. Conclusions have been made about the advantages and disadvantages of CSI on TrueBeam and Halcyon electron accelerators. Conclusion: It is possible to treat patients with the CSI method on the Halcyon accelerator using the VMAT method with the same quality as on the TrueBeam accelerator.
瓦里安TrueBeam和瓦里安Halcyon加速器VMAT方法颅脊柱辐照方案的质量评价和剂量学参数比较
目的:比较分析VMAT技术在Varian TrueBeam和Halcyon电子加速器上进行的颅脑脊髓辐照方案的剂量学特性。材料与方法:对5例中枢神经系统肿瘤患者进行剂量分布比较。轮廓和规划在Eclipse 15.6版本中。计算并评价以下剂量特性:均匀性指数(HI)、一致性指数(CI)、目标覆盖率(CO)和约束条件(晶体、食道、肺、心、肝、肠袋和肾脏)。进行患者特异性QA以验证计划系统中计算的剂量分布与加速器处获得的剂量分布的一致性。结果:所有CSI方案的目标覆盖指标均为D98> 95%,获得了关键器官的约束条件。两种加速器的均匀性指数HI<=0.12。TrueBeam加速器的CI符合性指数均值为1.09,Halcyon加速器的CI符合性指数均值为1.12。伽马分析显示,TrueBeam和Halcyon两种方案的结果都在公差范围内。总结了CSI在TrueBeam和Halcyon电子加速器上的优缺点。结论:在Halcyon加速器上采用CSI方法治疗患者,可以采用与TrueBeam加速器相同质量的VMAT方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书