A comparative study of photoenhanced wet chemical etching and reactive ion etching of GaN epilayers grown on various substrates

B. M. Kinder, T. Tansley
{"title":"A comparative study of photoenhanced wet chemical etching and reactive ion etching of GaN epilayers grown on various substrates","authors":"B. M. Kinder, T. Tansley","doi":"10.1109/COMMAD.1998.791618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have explored wet and dry etching of GaN epilayers using photoenhanced wet etching and reactive ion etching. Samples investigated were commercially grown by hydride vapour phase epitaxy (HVPE) on SiC and sapphire substrates. Aqueous KOH was used for an electrolyte and UV illumination from a xenon lamp for photoenhanced wet etching. For reactive ion etching, we used a gas mixture of CCl/sub 2/F/sub 2/ and argon. Typical etch rates measured were 40 nm/min and 20 nm/min for wet and dry etching respectively. We found that post wet-etched surfaces were very rough compared with dry etched surfaces. Both techniques were found to reveal the defects in the epilayers and reactive ion etching revealed etch pits in the GaN/Al/sub 2/O/sub 3/ samples. Etch pit density was found to increase slightly as etch time progressed and after 30 minutes, the density was 1/spl times/10/sup 8//cm/sup 2/. After 90 minutes etching, the substrate was revealed and no etch pits were observed.","PeriodicalId":300064,"journal":{"name":"1998 Conference on Optoelectronic and Microelectronic Materials and Devices. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX140)","volume":"464 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1998 Conference on Optoelectronic and Microelectronic Materials and Devices. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX140)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMMAD.1998.791618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

We have explored wet and dry etching of GaN epilayers using photoenhanced wet etching and reactive ion etching. Samples investigated were commercially grown by hydride vapour phase epitaxy (HVPE) on SiC and sapphire substrates. Aqueous KOH was used for an electrolyte and UV illumination from a xenon lamp for photoenhanced wet etching. For reactive ion etching, we used a gas mixture of CCl/sub 2/F/sub 2/ and argon. Typical etch rates measured were 40 nm/min and 20 nm/min for wet and dry etching respectively. We found that post wet-etched surfaces were very rough compared with dry etched surfaces. Both techniques were found to reveal the defects in the epilayers and reactive ion etching revealed etch pits in the GaN/Al/sub 2/O/sub 3/ samples. Etch pit density was found to increase slightly as etch time progressed and after 30 minutes, the density was 1/spl times/10/sup 8//cm/sup 2/. After 90 minutes etching, the substrate was revealed and no etch pits were observed.
不同衬底上生长的GaN薄膜的光增强湿化学蚀刻与反应离子蚀刻的比较研究
我们探索了用光增强湿蚀刻和反应离子蚀刻制备GaN薄膜的湿法和干法蚀刻。所研究的样品采用氢化物气相外延(HVPE)在SiC和蓝宝石衬底上进行了商业化生长。水溶液KOH用作电解液和氙灯的紫外照明,用于光增强湿法蚀刻。对于反应离子蚀刻,我们使用了CCl/sub - 2/F/sub - 2/和氩气的混合物。湿法和干法刻蚀的典型刻蚀速率分别为40 nm/min和20 nm/min。我们发现湿蚀刻后的表面与干蚀刻表面相比非常粗糙。两种方法都发现了脱膜层的缺陷,反应离子刻蚀在GaN/Al/sub 2/O/sub 3/样品中发现了蚀刻坑。随着刻蚀时间的延长,刻蚀坑密度略有增加,30min后刻蚀坑密度为1/ sp1倍/10/sup 8//cm/sup 2/。蚀刻90分钟后,衬底露出,未观察到蚀刻坑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信