Environments of Control in the Films of Melanie Gilligan

Holger Kuhn
{"title":"Environments of Control in the Films of Melanie Gilligan","authors":"Holger Kuhn","doi":"10.1344/regac2022.8.41406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2008, the artist Melanie Gilligan has been investigating how the techniques of machinic capitalism have intensified in the face of digital environments. This is expounded upon in three video works in particular. Crisis in the Credit System (2008) raises the question of how the market, controlled by an “invisible hand”, functions as the milieu of an economic subject. Popular Unrest (2010) shows how algorithms intervene in the reproduction of life and, in doing so, not only govern subjects, but interpret their infra- and supraindividual data traces as an environment. In The Common Sense (2014), society regulates itself through a decentralized but omnipresent affective network created by environmentally distributed technologies. In this paper I want to ask what kind of power-formation is sketched by Melanie Gilligan, especially since the focus of all three works is put on the control of environmental factors. \nIn order to achieve this, I will follow what Foucault developed in his lectures on The Birth of Biopolitics. The power-formation he calls governmentality does not aim at the production of subjects (as disciplinary techniques), but rather at the control over their milieus or environments. I want to show that this is a central aspect of the power formation, that is implicated in the diegetic universes of Gilligan’s films. Additionally I discuss more recent contributions to the question of machinic control: Erich Hörl’s concept of environmentalization, Antointette Rouvroy’s term algorithmic governmentality, Gerald Raunig’s latest thoughts about the dividuum and machinic capitalism, as well as Maurizio Lazzarato who has taken up Deleuze’s and Guattari’s thoughts about asignifying semiotics. \nBy successively working through Gilligan’s three works, I conclude that the way Gilligan conceives of different formations of control may be analyzed as allegories of historical and technological processes of governmentality, that reach from the 18th century’s milieu of the market to today’s digital milieus.","PeriodicalId":234406,"journal":{"name":"REGAC - Revista de Estudios Globales y Arte Contempor�neo","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REGAC - Revista de Estudios Globales y Arte Contempor�neo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1344/regac2022.8.41406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2008, the artist Melanie Gilligan has been investigating how the techniques of machinic capitalism have intensified in the face of digital environments. This is expounded upon in three video works in particular. Crisis in the Credit System (2008) raises the question of how the market, controlled by an “invisible hand”, functions as the milieu of an economic subject. Popular Unrest (2010) shows how algorithms intervene in the reproduction of life and, in doing so, not only govern subjects, but interpret their infra- and supraindividual data traces as an environment. In The Common Sense (2014), society regulates itself through a decentralized but omnipresent affective network created by environmentally distributed technologies. In this paper I want to ask what kind of power-formation is sketched by Melanie Gilligan, especially since the focus of all three works is put on the control of environmental factors. In order to achieve this, I will follow what Foucault developed in his lectures on The Birth of Biopolitics. The power-formation he calls governmentality does not aim at the production of subjects (as disciplinary techniques), but rather at the control over their milieus or environments. I want to show that this is a central aspect of the power formation, that is implicated in the diegetic universes of Gilligan’s films. Additionally I discuss more recent contributions to the question of machinic control: Erich Hörl’s concept of environmentalization, Antointette Rouvroy’s term algorithmic governmentality, Gerald Raunig’s latest thoughts about the dividuum and machinic capitalism, as well as Maurizio Lazzarato who has taken up Deleuze’s and Guattari’s thoughts about asignifying semiotics. By successively working through Gilligan’s three works, I conclude that the way Gilligan conceives of different formations of control may be analyzed as allegories of historical and technological processes of governmentality, that reach from the 18th century’s milieu of the market to today’s digital milieus.
梅兰妮·吉利根电影中的控制环境
自2008年以来,艺术家梅勒妮·吉利根(Melanie Gilligan)一直在研究机器资本主义的技术如何在数字环境中得到强化。这在三个视频作品中得到了详细的阐述。《信用体系危机》(2008)提出了一个问题,即由“看不见的手”控制的市场如何作为经济主体的环境发挥作用。《大众动乱》(Popular Unrest, 2010)展示了算法如何干预生命的再现,在这样做的过程中,算法不仅控制了主体,还将其基础和超个人的数据轨迹解释为一种环境。在《常识》(2014)中,社会通过环境分布式技术创造的分散但无所不在的情感网络来调节自己。在这篇文章中,我想问Melanie Gilligan描绘了一种什么样的权力形成,特别是因为这三部作品的重点都放在了环境因素的控制上。为了达到这个目的,我将遵循福柯在《生命政治学的诞生》中所阐述的内容。他称之为治理的权力形成并不是针对主体的生产(作为纪律技术),而是针对对其环境或环境的控制。我想说明的是,这是权力形成的一个核心方面,在吉利根电影的叙事世界中也有牵连。此外,我还讨论了最近对机械控制问题的贡献:Erich Hörl的环境化概念,Antointette Rouvroy的术语算法治理,Gerald Raunig关于个体和机器资本主义的最新思想,以及Maurizio Lazzarato,他接受了德勒兹和Guattari关于指定符号学的思想。通过连续阅读吉利根的三部作品,我得出结论,吉利根设想的不同控制形式的方式可以作为治理的历史和技术过程的寓言来分析,从18世纪的市场环境到今天的数字环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信