Editorial: Five challenges in detection and mitigation of disinformation on social media

M. Bastos
{"title":"Editorial: Five challenges in detection and mitigation of disinformation on social media","authors":"M. Bastos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3874410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses five challenges in detection and mitigation of disinformation on social media platforms. We discuss the limitations of fact-checking, the main mitigation strategy currently in place, against influence operations that leverage the low persistence and high ephemerality of social media poststo move from one contentious and unverified frame to the next before fact-checking mechanismscan correctfalse information. We argue that fact-checking, a tool originally devised to evaluate political claims and hold politicians to account, can rarelymeet the scale, speed, velocity, and magnitude of mis-anddisinformation on social media.We also argue that the conflicting priorities of privacyand safety championed by policymakers rendered social media platforms increasingly more opaqueand paradoxically less accountable. We close with an assessment that mitigation strategies available to the academic community are severely limited, and that independent source attribution is near impossible in the wake of data access lockdowns.","PeriodicalId":143302,"journal":{"name":"Online Inf. Rev.","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Inf. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3874410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article discusses five challenges in detection and mitigation of disinformation on social media platforms. We discuss the limitations of fact-checking, the main mitigation strategy currently in place, against influence operations that leverage the low persistence and high ephemerality of social media poststo move from one contentious and unverified frame to the next before fact-checking mechanismscan correctfalse information. We argue that fact-checking, a tool originally devised to evaluate political claims and hold politicians to account, can rarelymeet the scale, speed, velocity, and magnitude of mis-anddisinformation on social media.We also argue that the conflicting priorities of privacyand safety championed by policymakers rendered social media platforms increasingly more opaqueand paradoxically less accountable. We close with an assessment that mitigation strategies available to the academic community are severely limited, and that independent source attribution is near impossible in the wake of data access lockdowns.
社论:在社交媒体上发现和减轻虚假信息的五大挑战
本文讨论了在社交媒体平台上检测和减轻虚假信息的五大挑战。我们讨论了事实核查的局限性,即目前主要的缓解策略,针对影响操作,利用社交媒体帖子的低持久性和高短暂性,在事实核查机制能够纠正虚假信息之前,从一个有争议和未经验证的框架转移到另一个框架。我们认为,事实核查是一种最初被设计用来评估政治主张并让政治家承担责任的工具,但它很少能满足社交媒体上错误和虚假信息的规模、速度、速度和程度。我们还认为,政策制定者所倡导的隐私和安全的冲突优先事项使社交媒体平台变得越来越不透明,自相矛盾的是,责任越来越少。我们最后的评估是,学术界可用的缓解策略严重有限,在数据访问封锁之后,独立的来源归属几乎是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信