Theory and Narrative in Soviet Studies: The Relevance of Natalya Kozlova’s Thought for the Political Theory of Modernity

M. Fetisov
{"title":"Theory and Narrative in Soviet Studies: The Relevance of Natalya Kozlova’s Thought for the Political Theory of Modernity","authors":"M. Fetisov","doi":"10.17323/1728-192X-2017-1-227-246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is intended to present and reconstruct the original theoretical vision of the Soviet society elaborated by the Russian social theorist, philosopher, and political anthropologist Natalya Kozlova (1946-2002). In contrast to common media and theoretical wisdom tagging Soviet society as “totalitarian,” Kozlova proposed a vivid theoretical picture consisting of diverse everyday practices and social techniques comprising the Soviet version of modernity. This picture is based on the thorough sociological and anthropological analysis of different autobiographical narratives and diaries of everyday life as written by ordinary actors of Soviet modernization. The theoretical analysis of the Soviet modernity presented in this “bottom-up” perspective radically puts the theoretical relevance of any unifying and undifferentiated dominant political and ideological concepts and narratives that depict its history as the one of endless repression leaving no room for the actions of individual actors to be brought into question. The article analyses the detrimental influence of widespread media and theoretical narratives based on such ideologically informed concepts as “totalitarianism,” “internal colonization,” or “open society” on the theoretical conceptualization of the Soviet experience. It argues that the mainstream, uncritical usage of these stigmatizing narratives in the Russian media and in social science impedes new ways of thinking about the Soviet experience. Following the theoretical insights revealed by the research project of Natalya Kozlova, the paper explores the topics of agency, power, and the production of subjectivity while proposing the invention of ways for a more sophisticated comprehension of Soviet society within a wider context of the political theory of modernity.","PeriodicalId":137616,"journal":{"name":"The Russian Sociological Review","volume":"458 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Russian Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2017-1-227-246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is intended to present and reconstruct the original theoretical vision of the Soviet society elaborated by the Russian social theorist, philosopher, and political anthropologist Natalya Kozlova (1946-2002). In contrast to common media and theoretical wisdom tagging Soviet society as “totalitarian,” Kozlova proposed a vivid theoretical picture consisting of diverse everyday practices and social techniques comprising the Soviet version of modernity. This picture is based on the thorough sociological and anthropological analysis of different autobiographical narratives and diaries of everyday life as written by ordinary actors of Soviet modernization. The theoretical analysis of the Soviet modernity presented in this “bottom-up” perspective radically puts the theoretical relevance of any unifying and undifferentiated dominant political and ideological concepts and narratives that depict its history as the one of endless repression leaving no room for the actions of individual actors to be brought into question. The article analyses the detrimental influence of widespread media and theoretical narratives based on such ideologically informed concepts as “totalitarianism,” “internal colonization,” or “open society” on the theoretical conceptualization of the Soviet experience. It argues that the mainstream, uncritical usage of these stigmatizing narratives in the Russian media and in social science impedes new ways of thinking about the Soviet experience. Following the theoretical insights revealed by the research project of Natalya Kozlova, the paper explores the topics of agency, power, and the production of subjectivity while proposing the invention of ways for a more sophisticated comprehension of Soviet society within a wider context of the political theory of modernity.
苏联研究中的理论与叙事:纳塔利娅·科兹洛娃思想对现代性政治理论的启示
本文旨在呈现并重构俄罗斯社会理论家、哲学家、政治人类学家娜塔莉亚·科兹洛娃(natalie Kozlova, 1946-2002)所阐述的苏联社会的原始理论视野。与将苏联社会贴上“极权主义”标签的普通媒体和理论智慧相反,科兹洛娃提出了一幅生动的理论图景,其中包括各种日常实践和社会技术,构成了苏联版的现代性。这幅画是基于对不同的自传体叙事和日常生活日记的全面社会学和人类学分析,这些都是由苏联现代化的普通演员写的。在这种“自下而上”的视角下,对苏联现代性的理论分析从根本上提出了任何统一的、无差别的主导政治和意识形态概念和叙事的理论相关性,这些概念和叙事将其历史描述为无休止的镇压,没有给个体行动者的行动留下任何质疑的余地。本文分析了基于“极权主义”、“内部殖民”或“开放社会”等意识形态知情概念的广泛传播的媒体和理论叙述对苏联经验的理论概念化的有害影响。它认为,俄罗斯媒体和社会科学对这些污名化叙事的主流、不加批判的使用阻碍了对苏联经历的新思考。根据Natalya Kozlova的研究项目所揭示的理论见解,本文探讨了代理、权力和主体性产生的主题,同时提出了在更广泛的现代性政治理论背景下更复杂地理解苏联社会的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信