The Integrated Threat Theory (ITT) and Internal Auditors’ Independence in the Saudi Listed Companies

VOLUME 18 Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.36394/jhss/18/1a/13
Mohammed Alabbas
{"title":"The Integrated Threat Theory (ITT) and Internal Auditors’ Independence in the Saudi Listed Companies","authors":"Mohammed Alabbas","doi":"10.36394/jhss/18/1a/13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:\nThis study aims to investigate the effect of prejudice on the attitude of the auditee toward the internal auditors’ independence in Saudi Corporations. This study adopted the definitions of prejudice put forward by Allport (1954) and Stephan & Stephan (1996) as negative attitudes or evaluations held towards a particular group because of certain characteristics that the group possesses. The Integrated Threat Theory (ITT) developed by Stephan et al. (1996) postulates that prejudice is a conflict that negatively influences out-group attitudes. Using a sample of 210 participants from the Saudi Corporations, three models were developed, and the results indicate that auditee staff will develop prejudice when they become wary about internal auditors and their reports, a result that supports the literature in this regard. In addition, the results indicate that when the managers become anxious due to threats, they also become worried about the auditor’s independence. Besides, the management will feel real threat from the internal auditor.\nKeywords: Internal Auditing, Prejudice, Integrated Threat Theory, Auditor Independence, Conflict, Auditing Behavioural.","PeriodicalId":351777,"journal":{"name":"VOLUME 18","volume":"204 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VOLUME 18","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36394/jhss/18/1a/13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to investigate the effect of prejudice on the attitude of the auditee toward the internal auditors’ independence in Saudi Corporations. This study adopted the definitions of prejudice put forward by Allport (1954) and Stephan & Stephan (1996) as negative attitudes or evaluations held towards a particular group because of certain characteristics that the group possesses. The Integrated Threat Theory (ITT) developed by Stephan et al. (1996) postulates that prejudice is a conflict that negatively influences out-group attitudes. Using a sample of 210 participants from the Saudi Corporations, three models were developed, and the results indicate that auditee staff will develop prejudice when they become wary about internal auditors and their reports, a result that supports the literature in this regard. In addition, the results indicate that when the managers become anxious due to threats, they also become worried about the auditor’s independence. Besides, the management will feel real threat from the internal auditor. Keywords: Internal Auditing, Prejudice, Integrated Threat Theory, Auditor Independence, Conflict, Auditing Behavioural.
综合威胁理论与沙特上市公司内部审计师的独立性
摘要:本研究旨在探讨偏见对被审计方对沙特企业内部审计师独立性态度的影响。本研究采用了Allport(1954)和Stephan & Stephan(1996)对偏见的定义,即由于该群体具有某些特征而对该群体持有的消极态度或评价。Stephan et al.(1996)提出的综合威胁理论(ITT)认为,偏见是一种对群体外态度产生负面影响的冲突。使用来自沙特公司的210名参与者的样本,开发了三个模型,结果表明,当被审计人员对内部审计师及其报告持谨慎态度时,他们会产生偏见,这一结果支持了这方面的文献。此外,研究结果表明,当管理者因受到威胁而感到焦虑时,他们也会对审计师的独立性感到担忧。此外,管理层会感受到来自内部审计师的真实威胁。关键词:内部审计,偏见,综合威胁理论,审计师独立性,冲突,审计行为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信