Wire delay is not a problem for SMT (in the near future)

T. N. Vijaykumar, Zeshan A. Chishti
{"title":"Wire delay is not a problem for SMT (in the near future)","authors":"T. N. Vijaykumar, Zeshan A. Chishti","doi":"10.1145/1028176.1006706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous papers have shown that the slow scaling of wire delays compared to logic delays will prevent superscalar performance from scaling with technology. In this paper, we show that the optimal pipeline for superscalar becomes shallower with technology, when wire delays are considered, tightening previous results that deeper pipelines perform only as well as shallower pipelines. The key reason for the lack of performance scaling is that superscalar does not have sufficient parallelism to hide the relatively-increased wire delays. However, Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT) provides the much-needed parallelism. We show that an SMT running a multiprogrammed workload with just 4-way issue not only retains the optimal pipeline depth over technology generations, enabling at least 43% increase in clock speed every generation, but also achieves the remainder of the expected speedup of two per generation through IPC. As wire delays become more dominant in future technologies, the number of programs needs to be scaled modestly to maintain the scaling trends, at least till the near-future 50nm technology. While this result ignores bandwidth constraints, using SMT to tolerate latency due to wire delays is not that simple because SMT causes bandwidth problems. Most of the stages of a modern out-of-order-issue pipeline employ RAM and CAM structures. Wire delays in conventional, latency-optimized RAM/CAM structures prevent them from being pipelined in a scaled manner. We show that this limitation prevents scaling of SMT throughput. We use bitline scaling to allow RAM/CAM bandwidth to scale with technology. Bitline scaling enables SMT throughput to scale at the rate of two per technology generation in the near future.","PeriodicalId":268352,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 31st Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2004.","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 31st Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1028176.1006706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Previous papers have shown that the slow scaling of wire delays compared to logic delays will prevent superscalar performance from scaling with technology. In this paper, we show that the optimal pipeline for superscalar becomes shallower with technology, when wire delays are considered, tightening previous results that deeper pipelines perform only as well as shallower pipelines. The key reason for the lack of performance scaling is that superscalar does not have sufficient parallelism to hide the relatively-increased wire delays. However, Simultaneous Multithreading (SMT) provides the much-needed parallelism. We show that an SMT running a multiprogrammed workload with just 4-way issue not only retains the optimal pipeline depth over technology generations, enabling at least 43% increase in clock speed every generation, but also achieves the remainder of the expected speedup of two per generation through IPC. As wire delays become more dominant in future technologies, the number of programs needs to be scaled modestly to maintain the scaling trends, at least till the near-future 50nm technology. While this result ignores bandwidth constraints, using SMT to tolerate latency due to wire delays is not that simple because SMT causes bandwidth problems. Most of the stages of a modern out-of-order-issue pipeline employ RAM and CAM structures. Wire delays in conventional, latency-optimized RAM/CAM structures prevent them from being pipelined in a scaled manner. We show that this limitation prevents scaling of SMT throughput. We use bitline scaling to allow RAM/CAM bandwidth to scale with technology. Bitline scaling enables SMT throughput to scale at the rate of two per technology generation in the near future.
线延迟对SMT来说不是问题(在不久的将来)
先前的论文已经表明,与逻辑延迟相比,线延迟的缓慢缩放将阻止超标量性能随技术的缩放。在本文中,我们表明,当考虑导线延迟时,随着技术的发展,超标量的最佳管道变得更浅,从而加强了先前的结果,即深层管道的性能与浅管道一样好。缺乏性能可伸缩性的关键原因是,超标量没有足够的并行性来隐藏相对增加的线延迟。然而,同步多线程(SMT)提供了急需的并行性。我们表明,运行仅具有4路问题的多程序工作负载的SMT不仅在技术代中保持最佳管道深度,使每代时钟速度至少增加43%,而且还通过IPC实现了每代两个预期加速的剩余部分。随着线延迟在未来技术中占据主导地位,至少在不久的将来50nm技术之前,程序的数量需要适度地扩展以保持扩展趋势。虽然这个结果忽略了带宽限制,但是使用SMT来容忍由线路延迟引起的延迟并不是那么简单,因为SMT会导致带宽问题。现代乱序问题管道的大多数阶段都采用RAM和CAM结构。传统的、延迟优化的RAM/CAM结构中的导线延迟阻止了它们以规模化的方式进行流水线。我们表明,这种限制阻止了SMT吞吐量的扩展。我们使用位线缩放来允许RAM/CAM带宽随技术扩展。位线扩展使SMT吞吐量在不久的将来以每一代技术两个的速度扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信