A Biosemiotic Modeling of the Body-“Self” Synechism

Maria Asuncion L. Magsino
{"title":"A Biosemiotic Modeling of the Body-“Self” Synechism","authors":"Maria Asuncion L. Magsino","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.100037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a counterargument to the Cartesian split that has impacted both speculative and practical fields of knowledge and culture, we propose Peirce’s doctrine of synechism to show the continuity in the semiotic activity that moves from the body as an Interpretant to the emergence of another Interpretant called the “self.” Biosemiotics, a nascent field of interdisciplinary research that tackles inquiries about signs, communication, and information involving living organisms is used as the framework in the discussion. The main question of whether a non-material “self” can emerge from a material body is tackled in many stages. First, the biosemiotic continuum is established in the natural biological processes that takes place in the body. These processes can be taken as an autonomous semiotic system generating the “language” of the body or the Primary Modeling System (PMS). Second, synechism is also observed in the relationship between the mind and the body and this is evident in any physician’s clinical practice. The patient creates a Secondary Modeling System (SMS) of how she perceives what the body communicates to her regarding its state or condition. Finally, the question about whether the emergence of “self” is synechistic as well is tackled. There is one organ from which emerges an Interpretant that is capable of generating a dialog between a Subject, that is the “self,” with its Object, and that is the brain. It is the primordial seat of specifically human activities like thought and language. The recent theory on quantum consciousness supports the doctrine synechism between the body as Interpretant to the “self” as Interpretant. This synechism is crucial for the creation of Secondary Models of “reality” that will, in turn, determine the creation of Tertiary Models more familiarly called culture.","PeriodicalId":159975,"journal":{"name":"Mind and Matter - Challenges and Opportunities in Cognitive Semiotics and Aesthetics [Working Title]","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mind and Matter - Challenges and Opportunities in Cognitive Semiotics and Aesthetics [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.100037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a counterargument to the Cartesian split that has impacted both speculative and practical fields of knowledge and culture, we propose Peirce’s doctrine of synechism to show the continuity in the semiotic activity that moves from the body as an Interpretant to the emergence of another Interpretant called the “self.” Biosemiotics, a nascent field of interdisciplinary research that tackles inquiries about signs, communication, and information involving living organisms is used as the framework in the discussion. The main question of whether a non-material “self” can emerge from a material body is tackled in many stages. First, the biosemiotic continuum is established in the natural biological processes that takes place in the body. These processes can be taken as an autonomous semiotic system generating the “language” of the body or the Primary Modeling System (PMS). Second, synechism is also observed in the relationship between the mind and the body and this is evident in any physician’s clinical practice. The patient creates a Secondary Modeling System (SMS) of how she perceives what the body communicates to her regarding its state or condition. Finally, the question about whether the emergence of “self” is synechistic as well is tackled. There is one organ from which emerges an Interpretant that is capable of generating a dialog between a Subject, that is the “self,” with its Object, and that is the brain. It is the primordial seat of specifically human activities like thought and language. The recent theory on quantum consciousness supports the doctrine synechism between the body as Interpretant to the “self” as Interpretant. This synechism is crucial for the creation of Secondary Models of “reality” that will, in turn, determine the creation of Tertiary Models more familiarly called culture.
身体的生物符号学模型——“自我”协同
作为对笛卡尔分裂的反驳,我们提出皮尔斯的协同主义学说,以显示符号学活动的连续性,即从作为解释者的身体到另一个被称为“自我”的解释者的出现。生物符号学是一门新兴的跨学科研究领域,主要研究与生物体有关的符号、交流和信息,并将其作为讨论的框架。一个非物质的“自我”能否从一个物质的身体中浮现出来,这个主要问题需要分多个阶段来解决。首先,生物符号学连续体是在体内发生的自然生物过程中建立起来的。这些过程可以被看作是一个自主的符号系统,产生身体的“语言”或初级建模系统(PMS)。第二,在精神和身体之间的关系中也可以观察到协同作用,这在任何医生的临床实践中都很明显。患者创建了一个二级建模系统(SMS),来了解她如何感知身体就其状态或状况向她传达的信息。最后,关于“自我”的出现是否也是协同性的问题也被解决了。有一个器官产生了一个解释者,它能够在主体(即“自我”)和客体(即大脑)之间产生对话。它是思维和语言等特定人类活动的原始所在地。最近的量子意识理论支持身体作为解释者与“自我”作为解释者的学说协同。这种协同作用对于创建“现实”的二级模型至关重要,而二级模型反过来又决定了更熟悉的称为文化的三级模型的创建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信