Trends in volunteering and trends in the voluntary sector

R. Lindsey, J. Mohan, Sarah L. Bulloch, E. Metcalfe
{"title":"Trends in volunteering and trends in the voluntary sector","authors":"R. Lindsey, J. Mohan, Sarah L. Bulloch, E. Metcalfe","doi":"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447324836.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter assesses the degree of consistency and change in levels of voluntary action, using survey data from 1981 through to 2016; and considers both formal and informal volunteering. The key conclusion is that there has been a relatively stable level of engagement, especially in formal volunteering. In contrast, there is more evidence of fluctuation, especially in the post-2008 recessionary period – in the level of engagement in informal volunteering. Despite the optimism expressed by government ministers, there has been no decisive upward shift in engagement in volunteering. The chapter then uses the Mass Observation Project material to probe further into individual understandings of voluntary action. The material demonstrates that respondents do not always recognise the terminologies used in social surveys, often neglect to report an activity that might be characterised as volunteering, and tend to prioritise their commitments to informal care of family members and neighbours (issues which are largely not included in official survey definitions of voluntary action). Finally, the chapter presents data on the trends in the British voluntary sector since 1979, and shows that, while the level of voluntary action undertaken by individuals has remained unchanged, the scale of the voluntary sector has expanded in significant ways.","PeriodicalId":199990,"journal":{"name":"Continuity and Change in Voluntary Action","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuity and Change in Voluntary Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447324836.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter assesses the degree of consistency and change in levels of voluntary action, using survey data from 1981 through to 2016; and considers both formal and informal volunteering. The key conclusion is that there has been a relatively stable level of engagement, especially in formal volunteering. In contrast, there is more evidence of fluctuation, especially in the post-2008 recessionary period – in the level of engagement in informal volunteering. Despite the optimism expressed by government ministers, there has been no decisive upward shift in engagement in volunteering. The chapter then uses the Mass Observation Project material to probe further into individual understandings of voluntary action. The material demonstrates that respondents do not always recognise the terminologies used in social surveys, often neglect to report an activity that might be characterised as volunteering, and tend to prioritise their commitments to informal care of family members and neighbours (issues which are largely not included in official survey definitions of voluntary action). Finally, the chapter presents data on the trends in the British voluntary sector since 1979, and shows that, while the level of voluntary action undertaken by individuals has remained unchanged, the scale of the voluntary sector has expanded in significant ways.
志愿活动趋势和志愿部门趋势
本章使用1981年至2016年的调查数据,评估了自愿行动水平的一致性和变化程度;并考虑了正式和非正式的志愿服务。关键的结论是,参与的程度相对稳定,尤其是在正式的志愿活动中。相比之下,有更多证据表明,非正式志愿活动的参与程度存在波动,尤其是在2008年后的衰退时期。尽管政府部长们表达了乐观的态度,但参与志愿服务的人数并没有出现决定性的上升。然后,本章使用大众观察项目的材料进一步探讨个人对自愿行动的理解。材料表明,受访者并不总是认识到社会调查中使用的术语,经常忽视报告可能被描述为志愿服务的活动,并且倾向于优先考虑他们对家庭成员和邻居的非正式照顾(这些问题在很大程度上不包括在官方调查对志愿行动的定义中)。最后,本章提供了自1979年以来英国志愿部门趋势的数据,并表明,虽然个人采取的志愿行动水平保持不变,但志愿部门的规模却以显著的方式扩大了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信