Identification of Geothermal Reservoir Determination using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)

H. S. Pakpahan, Haviluddin, M. Wati
{"title":"Identification of Geothermal Reservoir Determination using Artificial Neural Network (ANN)","authors":"H. S. Pakpahan, Haviluddin, M. Wati","doi":"10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geothermal utilization in Indonesia is mostly for electricity generation. Electricity consumption has increased while geothermal production has not increased, so it is necessary to develop geothermal wells. One of the efforts is the prediction of well behavior so that the well performance can be known which a need for well development is. To predict the behavior of geothermal wells temperature prediction (T) and pressure (P) with location parameters (x and y), well depth (z) injection flow rate (qinj) and injection temperature (Tinj) using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) method. The first is the generation of well production models, M-1, M-2 and M-3, each model has 6 wells. Data is generated during one year of production and data separation is carried out, i.e. data for 11 months is used as ANN training data and data for the last 1 month is used as test data. The results of the prediction with ANN will be compared with the test data. Calculation of errors between the predicted results and the test data on M-1 is 0.0251 for temperature (T) and 0.0303 for pressure (P), while the MSE value is 0.00378. At M-2 is 0.0283 for temperature (T) and 0.0468 for pressure (P), while the MSE value is 0.000795. At M-3 is 0.0445 for temperature (T) and 0.0566 for pressure (P), while the MSE value is 0.0121. Based on the results obtained the error value and MSE are relatively small, so ANN can be used to predict the behavior of geothermal wells. Then the variation in the number of hidden layers is done. H-15 has the best error value and MSE, while h-50 has the best regression value (R).","PeriodicalId":424909,"journal":{"name":"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geothermal utilization in Indonesia is mostly for electricity generation. Electricity consumption has increased while geothermal production has not increased, so it is necessary to develop geothermal wells. One of the efforts is the prediction of well behavior so that the well performance can be known which a need for well development is. To predict the behavior of geothermal wells temperature prediction (T) and pressure (P) with location parameters (x and y), well depth (z) injection flow rate (qinj) and injection temperature (Tinj) using the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) method. The first is the generation of well production models, M-1, M-2 and M-3, each model has 6 wells. Data is generated during one year of production and data separation is carried out, i.e. data for 11 months is used as ANN training data and data for the last 1 month is used as test data. The results of the prediction with ANN will be compared with the test data. Calculation of errors between the predicted results and the test data on M-1 is 0.0251 for temperature (T) and 0.0303 for pressure (P), while the MSE value is 0.00378. At M-2 is 0.0283 for temperature (T) and 0.0468 for pressure (P), while the MSE value is 0.000795. At M-3 is 0.0445 for temperature (T) and 0.0566 for pressure (P), while the MSE value is 0.0121. Based on the results obtained the error value and MSE are relatively small, so ANN can be used to predict the behavior of geothermal wells. Then the variation in the number of hidden layers is done. H-15 has the best error value and MSE, while h-50 has the best regression value (R).
利用人工神经网络(ANN)识别地热储层
印度尼西亚的地热利用主要用于发电。用电量增加而地热产量没有增加,开发地热井是必要的。其中一项工作是预测井的动态,以便了解哪些井需要开发。利用人工神经网络(ANN)方法,利用位置参数(x和y)、井深(z)、注入流量(qinj)和注入温度(Tinj)预测地热井温度(T)和压力(P)的变化规律。首先是M-1、M-2、M-3井生产模型的生成,每个模型有6口井。数据生成时间为生产1年,并进行数据分离,即使用11个月的数据作为ANN训练数据,使用最近1个月的数据作为测试数据。用人工神经网络预测的结果将与测试数据进行比较。M-1上的预测结果与试验数据计算误差分别为温度(T) 0.0251和压力(P) 0.0303, MSE值为0.00378。在M-2时,温度(T)为0.0283,压力(P)为0.0468,而MSE值为0.000795。M-3处温度(T)为0.0445,压力(P)为0.0566,MSE值为0.0121。结果表明,人工神经网络的误差值和均方差都比较小,可以用于地热井的动态预测。然后完成隐藏层数的变化。H-15的误差值和MSE最好,h-50的回归值R最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信