An Argument for Restricting the Blue Pencil Doctrine

G. T. Pivateau
{"title":"An Argument for Restricting the Blue Pencil Doctrine","authors":"G. T. Pivateau","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3576169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The blue pencil doctrine gives courts the authority to either (1) strike unreasonable clauses from a noncompete agreement, leaving the rest to be enforced, or (2) actually modify the agreement to reflect the terms that the parties could have--and probably should have--agreed to.&nbsp;<br><br>In recent years, a number of courts refused to blue pencil noncompetition agreements. In response, some state legislatures responded by passing laws requiring courts to modify unreasonable noncompetition agreements. Legislation mandating the use of the blue pencil, even if well-intentioned, encourages employer overreach. This overreach harms employers, employees, and society as a whole.","PeriodicalId":357008,"journal":{"name":"Employment Law eJournal","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employment Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3576169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The blue pencil doctrine gives courts the authority to either (1) strike unreasonable clauses from a noncompete agreement, leaving the rest to be enforced, or (2) actually modify the agreement to reflect the terms that the parties could have--and probably should have--agreed to. 

In recent years, a number of courts refused to blue pencil noncompetition agreements. In response, some state legislatures responded by passing laws requiring courts to modify unreasonable noncompetition agreements. Legislation mandating the use of the blue pencil, even if well-intentioned, encourages employer overreach. This overreach harms employers, employees, and society as a whole.
限制蓝铅笔主义的争论
“蓝铅笔”原则赋予法院以下两种权力:(1)从竞业禁止协议中剔除不合理的条款,让其余条款得以执行;或(2)实际修改协议,以反映双方本可以——而且可能应该——同意的条款。近年来,许多法院拒绝接受“蓝铅笔”竞业禁止协议。作为回应,一些州立法机构通过法律要求法院修改不合理的竞业禁止协议。强制使用蓝色铅笔的立法,即使是出于好意,也会鼓励雇主越权。这种越权损害了雇主、雇员和整个社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信