COVID-19 and the Fed’s Monetary Policy

R. Hetzel
{"title":"COVID-19 and the Fed’s Monetary Policy","authors":"R. Hetzel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3711522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quantity theory, which posits a causal relationship between money and prices, is among the oldest theories in economics. Starting in March 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic affected the United States, money surged at a historically rapid pace. Historical experience, most recently with the Great Inflation of the mid-1960s through the 1970s, suggests that an uncontrolled surge in inflation is coming. Other factors in the intellectual and political environment are also reminiscent of the Great Inflation. The Federal Reserve has reverted to its 1950s “cost and availability” view of monetary transmission. There also exists a widespread belief that inflation is a nonmonetary phenomenon. In Keynesian terms, because the Phillips curve, which relates inflation and unemployment, is presumed to be flat, the Fed can push the unemployment rate to historically low levels. Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) chair Jerome Powell asserts that the course of the recovery will be dictated by the behavior of the virus. That makes sense in that the recession arose as a shock to potential output. Powell and the FOMC, however, treat the recession as if it originated in a large negative aggregate-demand shock requiring extremely stimulative monetary policy. The FOMC should follow a rule that ensures that the spring 2020 bulge in money dissipates.","PeriodicalId":244949,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Monetary & Fiscal Policies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3711522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The quantity theory, which posits a causal relationship between money and prices, is among the oldest theories in economics. Starting in March 2020 as the COVID-19 pandemic affected the United States, money surged at a historically rapid pace. Historical experience, most recently with the Great Inflation of the mid-1960s through the 1970s, suggests that an uncontrolled surge in inflation is coming. Other factors in the intellectual and political environment are also reminiscent of the Great Inflation. The Federal Reserve has reverted to its 1950s “cost and availability” view of monetary transmission. There also exists a widespread belief that inflation is a nonmonetary phenomenon. In Keynesian terms, because the Phillips curve, which relates inflation and unemployment, is presumed to be flat, the Fed can push the unemployment rate to historically low levels. Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) chair Jerome Powell asserts that the course of the recovery will be dictated by the behavior of the virus. That makes sense in that the recession arose as a shock to potential output. Powell and the FOMC, however, treat the recession as if it originated in a large negative aggregate-demand shock requiring extremely stimulative monetary policy. The FOMC should follow a rule that ensures that the spring 2020 bulge in money dissipates.
COVID-19和美联储的货币政策
数量理论假定货币和价格之间存在因果关系,是经济学中最古老的理论之一。从2020年3月开始,随着COVID-19大流行影响美国,资金以历史上最快的速度激增。历史经验(最近一次是上世纪60年代中期至70年代的大通胀)表明,通胀失控的飙升即将到来。知识和政治环境中的其他因素也让人想起大通货膨胀。美联储(fed)又回到了上世纪50年代关于货币传导的“成本和可用性”观点。人们还普遍认为,通货膨胀是一种非货币现象。用凯恩斯的术语来说,由于将通胀和失业率联系起来的菲利普斯曲线被认为是平坦的,美联储可以将失业率推至历史最低水平。联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)主席杰罗姆·鲍威尔断言,复苏的进程将取决于病毒的行为。这是有道理的,因为衰退是作为对潜在产出的冲击而出现的。然而,鲍威尔和联邦公开市场委员会(FOMC)将衰退视为源于大规模的负总需求冲击,需要采取极具刺激性的货币政策。联邦公开市场委员会应该遵循一项规则,确保2020年春季的货币膨胀消散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信