{"title":"USE OF ROUTINE SPECIAL STAINS FOR GASTRIC AND ESOPHAGEAL BIOPSIES","authors":"O. Belkacem","doi":"10.53555/eijmhs.v4i1.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem: Special stains such as the Giemsa, the Alcian blue (AB) and the Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) are widely used for gastric and/or esophageal biopsies for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and intestinal metaplasia (IM). The purpose of our study was to determine if these stains are actually needful \nMethods: We retrospectively studied 209 gastric and esophageal biopsies. We evaluated the H. pylori status on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and the presence of IM and finally we examined the special stains. \nResults: 23% of cases were H. pylori-positive. H&E stain had a high degree of accuracy (92,1%). The Giemsa stain was positive in 23,7% and negative in 71,8%. The Giemsa was useful in 16,7% biopsies. The AB revealed goblet cells in 4,8% cases. AB sensibility was 90,9%. From the 208 slides stained with PAS, 4,3% were classed IM-positive. PAS sensibility was 90%. The two special stains (AB and PAS) have made no diagnostic gain. \nConclusions: Routine special stains for every single gastric and/or esophageal biopsy are not required and H&E assessment combined with selective ordering of these stains will identify all cases of H. pylori gastritis and IM.","PeriodicalId":122699,"journal":{"name":"EPH - International Journal of Medical and Health Science","volume":"202 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPH - International Journal of Medical and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijmhs.v4i1.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Problem: Special stains such as the Giemsa, the Alcian blue (AB) and the Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) are widely used for gastric and/or esophageal biopsies for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and intestinal metaplasia (IM). The purpose of our study was to determine if these stains are actually needful
Methods: We retrospectively studied 209 gastric and esophageal biopsies. We evaluated the H. pylori status on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides and the presence of IM and finally we examined the special stains.
Results: 23% of cases were H. pylori-positive. H&E stain had a high degree of accuracy (92,1%). The Giemsa stain was positive in 23,7% and negative in 71,8%. The Giemsa was useful in 16,7% biopsies. The AB revealed goblet cells in 4,8% cases. AB sensibility was 90,9%. From the 208 slides stained with PAS, 4,3% were classed IM-positive. PAS sensibility was 90%. The two special stains (AB and PAS) have made no diagnostic gain.
Conclusions: Routine special stains for every single gastric and/or esophageal biopsy are not required and H&E assessment combined with selective ordering of these stains will identify all cases of H. pylori gastritis and IM.