Article 17

I. Prihandono
{"title":"Article 17","authors":"I. Prihandono","doi":"10.5771/9783845279893-588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One type of administrative action that can be reviewed by a Panel under the WTO standard of review is the imposition of anti dumping duties. However, some scholars found that it is not clear how the standard of review as stipulated in the WTO Anti Dumping Agreement should be applied. This essay will focus on the application of standard of review as stipulated in Article 17.6 of the AD Agreement by the WTO panels and the Appellate Body. It is argued that the ambiguity of Article 17.6 has resulted in less deference towards national authorities’ anti dumping decision. Consequently, the panels and Appellate Body decision also stands less in favour of the injured domestic producers’ interest to obtain relief.","PeriodicalId":249042,"journal":{"name":"UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)","volume":"878 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845279893-588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

One type of administrative action that can be reviewed by a Panel under the WTO standard of review is the imposition of anti dumping duties. However, some scholars found that it is not clear how the standard of review as stipulated in the WTO Anti Dumping Agreement should be applied. This essay will focus on the application of standard of review as stipulated in Article 17.6 of the AD Agreement by the WTO panels and the Appellate Body. It is argued that the ambiguity of Article 17.6 has resulted in less deference towards national authorities’ anti dumping decision. Consequently, the panels and Appellate Body decision also stands less in favour of the injured domestic producers’ interest to obtain relief.
第十七条
根据世贸组织的审查标准,可以由专家组审查的一种行政行为是征收反倾销税。然而,一些学者发现,WTO反倾销协定规定的审查标准应如何适用并没有明确规定。本文将重点讨论WTO专家组和上诉机构对《反倾销协议》第17.6条规定的审查标准的适用。有人认为,第17.6条的模糊性导致对国家当局反倾销决定的服从减少。因此,专家组和上诉机构的决定也不太有利于受害的国内生产商获得救济的利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信