Estimating local administrators’ participation in planning: case of “Egypt vision 2030”

IF 2.2
Heba Saleh Moghaieb
{"title":"Estimating local administrators’ participation in planning: case of “Egypt vision 2030”","authors":"Heba Saleh Moghaieb","doi":"10.1108/REPS-11-2018-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to address to what extent local administration is involved in national planning focusing on drafting and reviewing processes of “Egypt Vision 2030”.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper plan to use focus group discussions and descriptive-analytical approach with representatives of local administration in three governorates.\n\n\nFindings\nImportance of local participation is not any more a question; however, participation concept and methodology are what matters. Participatory approach is not complex-free. It is crucial to consider conflicts of interest groups, ideologies, and political trends, communities’ high expectations, particularly of those who were marginalized and deprived for long time. Definitions should not be unified on national, regional and local levels. Each community needs to agree on its own definitions, needs, dreams and paths toward development. Accordingly, the role of the planner is to expand choices and opportunities for each citizen. Participation in planning for the future must include the coming generation who are opting to live this tomorrow. That requires institutionalization of youth participation in the decision-making processes.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nIt was difficult to ensure meeting adequate sample; however, the author does believe that the participated sample represents the case.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe impact of public participation in planning on enhancing the planning processes and strategic planning outcomes and implementation is not a matter of questioning anymore, although governments do not pay due attention.\n\n\nSocial implications\nPublic participation in planning processes named participative planning is crucial for achieving development, social justice, economic development and public trust in governments.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper depends on focus-group discussions that were conducted by the author. Analysis and discussions reflect the author’s academic and practical experiences.\n","PeriodicalId":423562,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economics and Political Science","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economics and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-11-2018-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to address to what extent local administration is involved in national planning focusing on drafting and reviewing processes of “Egypt Vision 2030”. Design/methodology/approach The paper plan to use focus group discussions and descriptive-analytical approach with representatives of local administration in three governorates. Findings Importance of local participation is not any more a question; however, participation concept and methodology are what matters. Participatory approach is not complex-free. It is crucial to consider conflicts of interest groups, ideologies, and political trends, communities’ high expectations, particularly of those who were marginalized and deprived for long time. Definitions should not be unified on national, regional and local levels. Each community needs to agree on its own definitions, needs, dreams and paths toward development. Accordingly, the role of the planner is to expand choices and opportunities for each citizen. Participation in planning for the future must include the coming generation who are opting to live this tomorrow. That requires institutionalization of youth participation in the decision-making processes. Research limitations/implications It was difficult to ensure meeting adequate sample; however, the author does believe that the participated sample represents the case. Practical implications The impact of public participation in planning on enhancing the planning processes and strategic planning outcomes and implementation is not a matter of questioning anymore, although governments do not pay due attention. Social implications Public participation in planning processes named participative planning is crucial for achieving development, social justice, economic development and public trust in governments. Originality/value The paper depends on focus-group discussions that were conducted by the author. Analysis and discussions reflect the author’s academic and practical experiences.
评估地方管理者对规划的参与:以“埃及2030愿景”为例
本文旨在探讨地方政府在多大程度上参与了国家规划,重点是“埃及2030年愿景”的起草和审查过程。设计/方法/方法本文计划采用焦点小组讨论和描述性分析方法,与三个省的地方政府代表进行讨论。地方参与的重要性不再是一个问题;然而,参与的理念和方法才是关键。参与式方法并非没有复杂性。至关重要的是要考虑利益集团的冲突、意识形态和政治趋势、社区的高期望,特别是对那些长期被边缘化和被剥夺权利的人的高期望。不应在国家、区域和地方各级统一定义。每个社区需要就自己的定义、需求、梦想和发展道路达成一致。因此,规划师的作用是为每个公民扩大选择和机会。参与规划未来必须包括选择活在明天的下一代。这就需要使青年参与决策过程制度化。研究局限性/意义难以确保满足足够的样本;然而,作者确实认为参与的样本代表了情况。公众参与规划对提高规划过程、战略规划成果和实施的影响不再是一个值得质疑的问题,尽管政府没有给予应有的重视。公众参与被称为参与式规划的规划过程对于实现发展、社会公正、经济发展和公众对政府的信任至关重要。原创性/价值这篇论文依赖于作者进行的焦点小组讨论。分析和讨论反映了作者的学术和实践经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书