Evaluating "Curriculum" and "Instruction"

Marvin C. Alkin
{"title":"Evaluating \"Curriculum\" and \"Instruction\"","authors":"Marvin C. Alkin","doi":"10.2307/1179129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A great number of potentially worthwhile evaluations are hampered because either the nature of what is being evaluated is not specified or the specification relies upon educational terms that are imprecise or ambiguous. The evaluation must specify whether it is an educational product, or teachers, or perhaps a program that is to be evaluated. If it is a program that is being evaluated, does the evaluation concern the program's goals, the program as described in the program plan, or the program as implemented? Such focal specification is necessary to the context and direction of the evaluation and must be expressed in unambiguous terms that do not permit multiple interpretations. Of necessity, an evaluation will use educational terms to establish focus.","PeriodicalId":273582,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Theory Network","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Theory Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

A great number of potentially worthwhile evaluations are hampered because either the nature of what is being evaluated is not specified or the specification relies upon educational terms that are imprecise or ambiguous. The evaluation must specify whether it is an educational product, or teachers, or perhaps a program that is to be evaluated. If it is a program that is being evaluated, does the evaluation concern the program's goals, the program as described in the program plan, or the program as implemented? Such focal specification is necessary to the context and direction of the evaluation and must be expressed in unambiguous terms that do not permit multiple interpretations. Of necessity, an evaluation will use educational terms to establish focus.
评价“课程”与“教学”
许多潜在的有价值的评估受到阻碍,因为被评估的内容的性质没有指定,或者规范依赖于不精确或含糊不清的教育术语。评估必须明确它是一个教育产品,还是教师,或者可能是一个要评估的程序。如果是一个正在评估的计划,评估是否涉及计划的目标,计划计划中描述的计划,或计划的实施?这种重点说明对于评价的背景和方向是必要的,并且必须以不允许多种解释的明确术语来表达。必要时,评估将使用教育术语来确定重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信