The Failure of Rachel H.: Practical Steps to Desegregating Special Education Systems

B. Elder, Robert J. Borrelle
{"title":"The Failure of Rachel H.: Practical Steps to Desegregating Special Education Systems","authors":"B. Elder, Robert J. Borrelle","doi":"10.1177/27324745221105229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This practitioner-oriented article uses the vignette of “David,” a disabled Student of Color, to discuss practical steps to desegregate special education systems in the United States. California students seeking inclusion through the courts have had little success under the least restrictive environment test articulated in Rachel H. v. Sacramento City Unified School District (1994). We argue that the Rachel H. test has favored students with the means to unilaterally secure inclusive placements and pursue litigation over those from marginalized communities languishing in restrictive placements. Then, we offer practical steps to reform special education infrastructure in three areas: (a) family and student engagement; (b) evidence-based school and classroom practices; and (c) professional learning for educators.","PeriodicalId":208398,"journal":{"name":"Inclusive Practices","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inclusive Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27324745221105229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This practitioner-oriented article uses the vignette of “David,” a disabled Student of Color, to discuss practical steps to desegregate special education systems in the United States. California students seeking inclusion through the courts have had little success under the least restrictive environment test articulated in Rachel H. v. Sacramento City Unified School District (1994). We argue that the Rachel H. test has favored students with the means to unilaterally secure inclusive placements and pursue litigation over those from marginalized communities languishing in restrictive placements. Then, we offer practical steps to reform special education infrastructure in three areas: (a) family and student engagement; (b) evidence-based school and classroom practices; and (c) professional learning for educators.
《Rachel H.的失败:消除特殊教育系统种族隔离的实际步骤》
这篇以实践者为导向的文章使用了一个有色人种残疾学生“大卫”的小插图,讨论了在美国废除特殊教育系统种族隔离的实际步骤。在Rachel H.诉萨克拉门托市联合学区案(1994)中,加州学生通过法院寻求包容,但在最少限制环境测试中几乎没有取得成功。我们认为,雷切尔·H.测试有利于那些单方面获得包容性安置的学生,并对那些在限制性安置中遭受痛苦的边缘化社区的学生提起诉讼。然后,我们在三个方面提出改革特殊教育基础设施的实际步骤:(a)家庭和学生参与;(b)基于证据的学校和课堂实践;(c)教育工作者的专业学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信