{"title":"社群媒體與政治廣告:分析2020年臺灣選舉的臉書政治廣告","authors":"林照真 林照真","doi":"10.53106/172635812022060041001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 2016年發生俄羅斯藉由購買美國臉書政治廣告,試圖影響美國大選事件。臉書檢討後推出廣告透明化政策,臺灣於2019年11月首度實施,禁止非臺灣人購買臉書政治廣告。選舉時盛行社群廣告,國內現行的《選舉罷免法》卻未規範社群媒體的廣告行為。本論文指出,臉書政治廣告使用演算法,為政黨與候選人瞄準特定選民。身分不明的出資者在臉書刊登的政治廣告,較可能出現特定的黨派立場。隱藏的個人與行銷公司進行的廣告購買,目前亦無法規範。\n Political advertisements on Facebook exhibited strong evidence of financial investment from Russia to disrupt the 2016 American election. Facebook made its practices of self-regulating political advertising transparent in November 2019, the time of the General Election in Taiwan. The advertising policy of Facebook prohibits non-Taiwanese from buying political advertisements. Because of the lack of laws and regulations regarding social media advertising, this study examined the purchase of political advertisements on Facebook. This study discovered that algorithms on Facebook help buyers identify voters. Political advertisements on Facebook purchased by anonymous third parties create political polarization. Unknown individuals and marketing firms play crucial roles in social media campaigns, but their practices of purchasing political advertisements and content are not transparent.\n \n","PeriodicalId":377163,"journal":{"name":"中華傳播學刊","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中華傳播學刊","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/172635812022060041001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
2016年發生俄羅斯藉由購買美國臉書政治廣告,試圖影響美國大選事件。臉書檢討後推出廣告透明化政策,臺灣於2019年11月首度實施,禁止非臺灣人購買臉書政治廣告。選舉時盛行社群廣告,國內現行的《選舉罷免法》卻未規範社群媒體的廣告行為。本論文指出,臉書政治廣告使用演算法,為政黨與候選人瞄準特定選民。身分不明的出資者在臉書刊登的政治廣告,較可能出現特定的黨派立場。隱藏的個人與行銷公司進行的廣告購買,目前亦無法規範。
Political advertisements on Facebook exhibited strong evidence of financial investment from Russia to disrupt the 2016 American election. Facebook made its practices of self-regulating political advertising transparent in November 2019, the time of the General Election in Taiwan. The advertising policy of Facebook prohibits non-Taiwanese from buying political advertisements. Because of the lack of laws and regulations regarding social media advertising, this study examined the purchase of political advertisements on Facebook. This study discovered that algorithms on Facebook help buyers identify voters. Political advertisements on Facebook purchased by anonymous third parties create political polarization. Unknown individuals and marketing firms play crucial roles in social media campaigns, but their practices of purchasing political advertisements and content are not transparent.
2016年发生俄罗斯借由购买美国脸书政治广告,试图影响美国大选事件。脸书检讨后推出广告透明化政策,台湾于2019年11月首度实施,禁止非台湾人购买脸书政治广告。选举时盛行社群广告,国内现行的《选举罢免法》却未规范社群媒体的广告行为。本论文指出,脸书政治广告使用演算法,为政党与候选人瞄准特定选民。身分不明的出资者在脸书刊登的政治广告,较可能出现特定的党派立场。隐藏的个人与行销公司进行的广告购买,目前亦无法规范。 Political advertisements on Facebook exhibited strong evidence of financial investment from Russia to disrupt the 2016 American election. Facebook made its practices of self-regulating political advertising transparent in November 2019, the time of the General Election in Taiwan. The advertising policy of Facebook prohibits non-Taiwanese from buying political advertisements. Because of the lack of laws and regulations regarding social media advertising, this study examined the purchase of political advertisements on Facebook. This study discovered that algorithms on Facebook help buyers identify voters. Political advertisements on Facebook purchased by anonymous third parties create political polarization. Unknown individuals and marketing firms play crucial roles in social media campaigns, but their practices of purchasing political advertisements and content are not transparent.