Comparison study of common brick with S+WPSA brick

M. Sani, F. Muftah
{"title":"Comparison study of common brick with S+WPSA brick","authors":"M. Sani, F. Muftah","doi":"10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6268834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common bricks in construction industry are divided into two types, namely as sand brick in white colour and clay brick in red colour. Cement brick or sand brick made from sand mixed with cement and formed into rectangular cubes or hollow rectangular cubes. Cement bricks are generally used for the construction of houses or small buildings as it is cheaper and often used for a less loaded structures. Brick wall in building is considered to be an important component in the construction due to its high cost. In addition, extensive cement and brick production plants contribute to air and noise pollution. Material recruitment process on hill to make cement also cause geological and landslide problems. S+WPSA Brick using sand and Waste Paper Sludge Ash (WPSA) mixture are solid rectangular cubes designed to be a cheaper but with similar compressive strength to common bricks and can overcome all the problems. This paper illustrates an experiment study and investigates the results of pundit test, skid resistance test and compressive strength test of common brick and S+WPSA brick. S+WPSA Brick indicates a more homogeneous, less void and good in quality compared to clay brick and sand brick. Besides that, the S+WPSA Brick introduces smoother surface compared to the sand bricks and clay brick in the market. Clay brick recorded the highest compressive strength of 15.17 MPa when compared with S+WPSA brick of 5.287 MPa and sand brick of 1.76 MPa.","PeriodicalId":426671,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SHUSER.2012.6268834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Common bricks in construction industry are divided into two types, namely as sand brick in white colour and clay brick in red colour. Cement brick or sand brick made from sand mixed with cement and formed into rectangular cubes or hollow rectangular cubes. Cement bricks are generally used for the construction of houses or small buildings as it is cheaper and often used for a less loaded structures. Brick wall in building is considered to be an important component in the construction due to its high cost. In addition, extensive cement and brick production plants contribute to air and noise pollution. Material recruitment process on hill to make cement also cause geological and landslide problems. S+WPSA Brick using sand and Waste Paper Sludge Ash (WPSA) mixture are solid rectangular cubes designed to be a cheaper but with similar compressive strength to common bricks and can overcome all the problems. This paper illustrates an experiment study and investigates the results of pundit test, skid resistance test and compressive strength test of common brick and S+WPSA brick. S+WPSA Brick indicates a more homogeneous, less void and good in quality compared to clay brick and sand brick. Besides that, the S+WPSA Brick introduces smoother surface compared to the sand bricks and clay brick in the market. Clay brick recorded the highest compressive strength of 15.17 MPa when compared with S+WPSA brick of 5.287 MPa and sand brick of 1.76 MPa.
普通砖与S+WPSA砖的对比研究
建筑业中常见的砖分为两种,即白色的砂砖和红色的粘土砖。水泥砖或砂砖由沙子与水泥混合而成的矩形立方体或空心矩形立方体。水泥砖通常用于建造房屋或小型建筑,因为它更便宜,而且通常用于负荷较小的结构。砖墙由于造价高而被认为是建筑的重要组成部分。此外,大量的水泥和砖生产工厂也造成了空气和噪音污染。在山上采料制水泥的过程也会引起地质和滑坡问题。使用沙子和废纸污泥灰(WPSA)混合物的砖是固体矩形立方体,设计为更便宜,但具有与普通砖相似的抗压强度,可以克服所有问题。本文对普通砖和S+WPSA砖进行了力学试验、抗滑试验和抗压强度试验。S+WPSA砖与粘土砖和砂砖相比,更均匀,更少空隙,质量好。此外,与市场上的砂砖和粘土砖相比,S+WPSA砖具有更光滑的表面。粘土砖抗压强度最高,为15.17 MPa, S+WPSA砖为5.287 MPa,砂砖为1.76 MPa。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信